CCMIN052582 - Laserfiche WebLink

387 ative vote of property owners owning 50% of the assessed value within the proposed district; and, it is up to the Council to determine who to put in an assessment district. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed on this item. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that the following findings could be made in this instance: (1) that because there are special circumstances having to do with the efficient utilization of the subject property, the strict application of the provisions of the Code would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification; (2) that because of the special circumstances mentioned in paragraph (1) above, the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties clas- sified in the same zoning district; (3) that the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to pro- perties or improvements in the vicinity; (4) that neither present nor anticipated future traffic volumes generated by the use of the site or the uses of sites in the vicinity reasonably require strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation; (5) that the granting of the variance will not result in the parking or loading of vehicles on public streets in such a manner as to interfere with the free flow of traffic on the streets; and (6) that the granting of the variance will not create a safety hazard or any other condition inconsistent with the objectives of this chapter, - and that Resolution No. 82-165, approving the appeal of Wanda Aldrich to Condition No. 2 imposed by the Board of Adjustment in their approval to allow con- tinued operation of a beauty shop which was enlarged at 541 Main Street without pro- viding the required off-street parking spaces and granting the variance without the assessment district requirement condition, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Application of the City of Pleasanton to rezone approximately 8.8 acres of land (4323 and 4365 Va~lel Avenue) located on the north side of Valley Avenue adjacent and to the west of the Valle~ Plaza Shoppin~ Center from the "A" (ASric.u!tural) and R-1-6500 (Single-family Residential) Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) HiSh Den- sity Residential District or to any other zoning district consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the pro- ject, the Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the pro- posed projec.t.._would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environ- ment and that an environmental impact report need not be pr.epared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Planning Division, 200 Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton. Com- ments on this decision may be directed to either the plannin~ staff prior to the above meeting date, or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meetin~ Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:179) dated May 17, 1982, regarding this matter. Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. No one in the audience spoke in favor of this item. 4. 5/25/82