Laserfiche WebLink
481 <br /> <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:135) dated April 1, 1982, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer, stated the base numbers of the report are <br /> find but offered the following suggestions: (1) add 100 dwelling unit permits to <br /> the 506 target number of residential units to be allocated in 1982 because of the <br /> fall-out factor; (2) after observing the total number to be set aside this year, <br /> smaller projects are getting a higher allocation than long term projects and he <br /> suggests this be more equal or evenly split; (3) suggest that City Council reserve <br /> final decision as to what happens if allocation to small projects is over-subscribed <br /> in some manner other than first-come, first-served. <br /> <br /> Mr. Doyle Heaton, Vintage Hills Associates, asked how soon long-term agreements <br />could be entered into. The City Attorney advised this could be done at anytime. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mike Parsons, Executive Director of the Pleasanton Housing Authority, urged <br />an allocation specifically for rental multiples, and asked about exemptions for low <br />cost housing. Staff advised that low cost housing is exempt from the Growth Manage- <br />ment Plan. Mr. Parsons inquired about sewer capacity availability for low income <br />housing, specifically whether past set-asides had assured sewage capacity. Staff <br />advised that some development permits had been set aside. Mr. Parsons asked for an <br />exact count. Council advised Mr. Parsons that the past lower-income set-asides con- <br />tinue in effect and that sewage capacity for these units has also been set aside, <br />and that staff could give him an exact count of the unused allocation upon his re- <br />quest. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ron Archer, Civil Engineer, 205 Main Street, stated he favors the Growth <br />Management Plan; that it will encourage small developers and create more infilling <br />development. He suggested the word "lots" be changed to "units". <br /> <br /> Mr. Bud Martin suggested the possibility of a priority allocation among the <br />smaller unit category for very low density units. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing <br />closed on this item. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- <br />member Kephart, that Resolution No. 82-121, establishing the City of Pleasanton's <br />1982 Growth Management Program to include: (1) the target number of residential units <br />to be allocated in 1982 is 506 units; (2) set aside 10% of the target number for de- <br />fined lower income units (51 units); (3) 227 units be allocated to smaller projects, <br />resulting in an allocation for long term agreements of approximately 228 units; (4) <br />the maximum number of units in a smaller project be set at 75 units; and (5) set <br />April 13, 1982, as the first day to accept applications for smaller projects, be <br />adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Hearins of objections by property owners to the proposed removal and abatement of <br />nuisance caused by noxious or danSerous weeds growing upon or in front of property <br />owned by them in the City of Pleasanton <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 82:122) dated April 1, 1982, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> 9. 4/6/82 <br /> <br /> <br />