CCMIN040682 - Laserfiche WebLink

493 After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that the City Council of the City of Pleasanton ranks the alternative methods of organizing to provide wastewater treatment and disposal capacity for the Valley, as described in the Sewer Committee report, in the following order: No. 1 - Alternative No. 2; Existing LAVWMA to provide export services; No. 2 - Alternative No. 3; Modified LAVWMA to include existing and additional agencies to provide export services; and that no further ranking of the other alternatives was deemed necessary at this time. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC No one in the audience addressed the chair. PUBLIC HEARINGS Application of Richard and Ursula Ultsch and Theodore Bates for prezoning and development plan approval for an approximately 247 dwelling unit project on an approximately 29 acre site located at the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. The property is currently prezoned P.U.D. (Planned Unit Develop- ment) Medium Density Residential District with certain conditions governing its development. The City Council maX recommend approval of the new prezon~ng and the proposed development plan or ma_ke any other recommendations regarding the subject property consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the projects. the Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Planning Division, 200 Bernal Avenue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning staff. prior to the above meeting date, or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meeting Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82.133) dated April 1, 1982, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the nega- tive declaration. Mr. William Hirst, 147 Bernal Avenue, Attorney representing the applicants, stated his client is here tonight to present a revised plan for the proposed pro- ject that hopefully will meet the concerns of Councilmembers and the residents in the area. He stated he has reviewed the staff report and the 38 conditions con- tatned therein, and agrees to the conditions with the exception of four. Condition No. 9, if approved, would require the applicant to install the front yard land- scaping. Mr. Hirst stated this issue had been discussed previously and it seemed to be more appropriate to make this optional, allowing the homeowner to install his own landscaping. He advised that the CC&R's would strictly control the timing and type of landscaping allowed. Mr. Hirst stated that since the streets now proposed will be the same as any other public streets, he felt they should be declared as public streets and that Conditions 33, 37, and 38 could be eliminated. Mr. Hirst 3. 4/6/82