CCMIN030982 - Laserfiche WebLink

357 Adoption of Ordinance No. 1027t consolidatin~ the general municipal election with the state-wide general election~ the effect of which would extend councilmembers terms which would have expired on the Tuesday .followins the April election to after the new November election date (Intro. 2-23-82~ 3-Ayes~ .~-Noes) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 1027 was introduced on February 23, 1982, by a vote of 3-Ayes, 2-Noes, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. Councilmember Mohr stated she favored consolidation with the primary election but could support consolidation with the general election. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Kephart, that Ordinance No. 1027, consolidating the general municipal election with the state-wide general election, the effect of which would extend councilmembers terms which would have expired on the Tuesday following the April election to after the new November election date, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Wood ABSENT: None Adoption of Ordinance No. 1028~ increasing councilmember salary levels to the statutory limit of $200.00 ~er month (Intro. 2-23-82, 4-Ayes, 1-No) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 1028 was introduced on February 23, 1982, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-No, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Ordinance No. 1028, increasing councilmember salary levels to the statutory limit of $200.00 per month, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Wood ABSENT: None REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Request to Resubmit Immobile Home Application Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 82:92) dated March 3, 1982, regarding this matter. Mr. William Hirst, Attorney representing Ed Parrish, stated that substantial changes have been made to the proposed project which were of concern to the Council. He advised the revisions consist of elimination of twenty-six lots (easternmost tier); widen all streets with residences located on both sides thereof to forty feet including rolled curbs; increase set backs on all lots to twenty-three feet back of the sidewalk save to the northernmost tier of duplexes and the southern- most tier of single-family units for which set backs will be twenty feet back of the sidewalk; decrease the number of single-family detached residences by twenty- two and increase the number of duplexes by eighteen for a total of 156 duplex and 91 single-family units; the senior citizen area would consist entirely of duplexes (36 duplexes at the easternmost portion of the tract). Mr. Hirst stated he felt these changes are substantial and warrant resubmittal of the project, first to the Planning Commission and then to the City Council. He stated Mr. Parrish would like to participate in both the Growth Management Plan and the Affordable Housing Com- petition, and respectfully requested that they be allowed to resubmit the proposed project for consideration by the Council. 7. 3/9/82