CCMIN030982 - Laserfiche WebLink

361 The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Appeal to retain a freestandin~ s.i~n located on the Downtown Center property a.t 235 Main Street. The property is zoned C-C/C-O (Central Commercial/Civic Overlay) District Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:86) dated March 2, 1982, regarding this matter. F~' Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. Mr. William Hirst, Attorney representing the applicant, requested this item be withdrawn from the agenda. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed and the appeal to retain a free- standing sign located on the Downtown Center property at 235 Main Street, dismissed from the agenda. Application of the. Cit~ of Pleasanton to rezone two parcels totallin~ approximately one acre at 1550 and 1588 Rose Avenue (Lane) from the "A" (A~ricultural) to the R-l-20 or R-l-10 (Single-family Residential) District or to any other zonin~ dis- trict consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project~ the D!yector of Planning and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Plannin~ Division.~ 200 Bernal Avenue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Plannin~ staff prior to the above meeting date~ or directly to the Cit~. Council at the above noticed meeting Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item, and continued to the meeting of March 23, 1982, 8:00 P.M., Pleasanton Council Chambers, at the request of staff. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Adoption of ordinance ~o.. 1016.~ approving the application of. the ~it~ of Pleasanton to prezone two parcels totallin~ 14.5 acres in the vicinity of 2820 Vineyard Avenue (eastern terminus of Chardonnay Drive) to PUD'(Planned Unit pevelopment) Residential District (Intro. 1-12-82~ 5-Ayes) (Contd. from 1-26-82~ 2-9-82~ and 2-23-82) Mayor Mercer stated that Ordinance No. 1016 was introduced on January 12, 1982, by a vote of 5-Ayes, and had been continued from 1-26-82, 2-9-82, and 2-23-82, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance. Mr. William Hirst, Attorney representing Mrs. Matilda Teixeira, stated that Mrs. Teixeira had filed the application to prezone to medium density to be consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan once provided that the entire 14 acres was general planned medium density residential. In 1976 half of the property was shown as low density and the other half as medium density. Mrs. Teixeira then applied for and staff recommended a Planned Unit Development zoning with straight residential overlay; staff feeling that this sort of zoning would allow City control over the density that might be generated for the entire site. With this sort of zoning the City could re- quite a density on the portion of the site shown as medium density as low as 1~ dwelling units per acre and even lower density on the other portion. Mr. Hirst 5. 3/9/82