CCMIN020982 - Laserfiche WebLink

249 It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1021, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of Thomas J. Orloff for development plan approval and PUD- High Density Residential zoning which would allow the construction of 150 apartment units and 20 condominium units on a 9.31 acre site located on the south side of Valley Avenue immediately west of Safeway Shopping Center, north of Amador Park and east of the single-family residential lots fronting on Brooktree Way, subject to conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2117, and conditions amended and set forth above by City Council and agreed to by the developer, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Wood ABSENT: None Mayor Mercer recessed the meeting at 10:45 P.M. Mayor Mercer reconvened the meeting at 10:55 P.M. Application of Joe Madden for Planned Unit Development zoning (PUD-Commercial and Offices) and determination of uses allowed for an approximately 13.7 acre site located at the northwest corner of StanleX Boulevard and First Street. Zoning for the property is "A" (Agrifultural) District.. The City Council may recommend .any zoning for the property consistent with the General Plan On the basis of an Initial Study of the potential environmental impacts of the project,...t.he Director of Planning and Community Development has determined that the propo~e~.project would not have any potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an envirpr~qental impa. ct report need not be prepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the PlanninM Division~ 209 .BerBal A~enue~ Pleasanton. Comments on this decisionmax be directed to either the Plannin$ staff prior to the above meeting dat~, .or. directly to the City Council at the above noticed meeting (Contd. Open from 1-26-82) Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:28) dated January 2, 1982, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer presented a letter from Earl Augusta dated February 7, 1982, regard- ing his concerns relative to this application as follows: "1. The 30 ft. right of way which parallels our property line and the railroad should be restricted from being used as a traffic outlet or inlet onto that part of Stanley. This should be true even if the 30 ft. strip is widened to include railroad property. If I understand correctly, Mr. Madden stated he would not object if this strip was not allowed as a traffic inlet or outlet. However, this is not perfectly clear in Section 2.2 of resolution #2122. I would like this to be made clear by this Council this evening. 2. No buildings should be allowed along this strip. As I understand, the recent storm drain easement is self protecting in this regard. Correct me if I am wrong. It is my hope that this restriction can be stated in some manner by the Council tonight. 3.On our back property line a driveway or parking area would be much preferred over a building being placed there. 4. I have been informed that every Commercial project near a residential area is required to have a buffer between the properties. Only a GP amendment can change that. My question tonight is just what is the minimum footage required and whether the developer has been so informed verbally or in writing at this time." 9. 2/9/82