CCMIN012682 - Laserfiche WebLink

215 Application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the various elements of the General Plan~ where appropriate and necessary~ to allow for modifications to the growth management system of the City (formerly ~.A.P.~ Res.idential Allocation Program). T_he City Council may make any recommendation relative to the above modifications On the basis of an Initial StudZ.of the potential environmental impacts of the project., the Director of Plannin~ and Community Development has determined that the proposed project would. ~pt have ~ny potential significant adverse effects on the environment and that an environmental impact report need not be prepared. This Initial Study is available for review at the Plannin~ Division~ 200 Bernal Avenue, Pleasanton. Comments on this decision may be directed to either the Planning staff prior to the above meeting date~ or directly to the City Council at the above noticed meeting Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:25) dated January 21, 1982, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the nega- tive declaration. No one in the audience spoke in favor of or in opposition to this item. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Harris requested the following two changes be made to the staff report: (1) amend Policy 21 to read "to ease the procedural requirements of the growth ~ana~ement plan (and delete residential allocation program) with respect to those small developments which, because of their size, would not affect materially the growth rate or provision of services should they develop"; and (2) delete Policy 6 of the Growth Management Element. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 82-28, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City~s guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate to amend the various elements of the General Plan, where appropriate and necessary, to allow for modifications to the growth management system of the City, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Kephart It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 82-29, approving the application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the various elements of the General Plan, where appropriate and necessary, to allow for modifications to the growth management system of the City (formerly R.A.P., Residential Allocation Program), including the 2 changes as recommended above,be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Kephart Appeal of Wild West Stores of a decision of the Design Review Boar.d. denying their application for a second wall sign on their store in the Best Plaz~ Shopping Center located at the northeast corner of Stoneridge Drive and Springdale Avenue (Contd. Open from 1-12-82) Mayor Mercer declared this public hearing continued open to the meeting of February 23, 1982, 8:00 P.M., Fairgrounds Cafeteria, at the request of the appellant. 10. 1/26/82