CCMIN112982 - Laserfiche WebLink

339 Mr. Sid Corrie, property owner, stated that Alternates A and B are unacceptable as it would split his property leaving unusable or difficult to use strips of land. He stated that Alternates C and D do not make much difference however he felt Alter- nate C is the best. Mr. Dean Wagerman, 2333 Martin Avenue, stated the "black line" disease that is damaging the walnut trees can be cured if enough money is spent to do so. He stated that regarding density, he felt the one acre minimum will be a detrimental situation; that it will create residences with animals and also be difficult to maintain. He stated that in many areas there are large estate size homes on 1/2, 3/4, and 1 acre lots, and he felt this is a good mixture. He stated that many homes in the area will demand one acre minimum lot size while others will not. Mr. Wagerman stated there has not been definitive planning for the seven 5-acre parcels he is representing but the owners agree with his concept and the first e~fort is to get zoning and then development PUD planning with mixed lot low-density zoning. Mr. Art Dunkley, Castlewood Properties, stated the conceptual plan for the Kamp property is just that; and that he is trying to accommodate a buffer with different zoning types to create a pleasing and attractive project. He stated the street pat- tern in the Kamp Droposal hopes to accommodate the significant intersections and requirements to carry traffic through and around neighboring properties. He stated that many hours had been spent with the property owners on ways they would like the property developer. Mr. David Gonsalves, 2215 Martin Avenue, stated he did not want to annex to the City at this time and felt the street pattern is being pushed down his throat. He stated the Waiterson property is greatly affected by the proposed street pattern. He stated he felt traffic would be increased on Martin Avenue when the Chu property is developed unless there is adequate access to Santa Rita Road provided within that property (via Molinaro). Also, with Martin Avenue extended north across the arroyo, it would attract traffic from the entire area seeking to avoid Santa Rita Road traffic congestion/signals. He stated that-to widen Martin Avenue would require taking much property, which would adversely impact the property owners, and change the environ- ment and lifestyle of the residents. Mr. Clem Finney, Architectural Coordinator for the Diocese of Oakland, stated he is concerned about the church property being considered for the five acre park site. He stated the church cooperated and supported the Devcon project in getting Rheem Drivebuilt, but he felt this is the limit that the church should be expected to contribute and that to be required to provide a five acre park in addition would be devastating. He stated it is vitally important that the church maintain the amount of property it now has for future church and/or school site. Mr. Finney stated he preferred Alternate A and would be willing to work with the City in order to make~ealigxunent in exchange of property to keep in tack an adequate amount of property to develop a parish and other aecessary facilities. Mr. Bob Cooper, Trenery Drive, stated he supports the comments previously sub- mitted by Mr. Wiemken and those that will be presented tonight. He stated he is concerned about credibility of decision-makers concerning this area; when develop- ment was first being considered it was determined that there would be no lot sizes less than five acres and now today 1/2 acre size lots are being considered. He stated he felt the Mohr/Martin area is unique and should have protection for all future annexations, zoning, and development. Mr. John Montgomery, 3700 Trenery Drive, stated he is opposed to Trenery Drive being a through street but is not opposed to development; but felt that consideration should be given to the surrounding neighbors as to how the area is developed and the street pattern required. 2. 11/29/82