CCMIN110982 - Laserfiche WebLink

291 Mr. David Gilchrist, 437 Amador Court, suggested that City Council assume respon- sibility for impact of traffic on Vineyard Avenue as it relates to the safety of children. Mr. Mike Harris rebutted the opponents by stating he is only asking for 27 addi- tional units; that 61 units have already been approved. He stated he felt the 61 units would create just as much traffic on Vineyard Avenue as the 88 units, and reiterated the fact that apartment rentals are needed in Pleasanton. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. Councilmember Wood stated the negative declaration shows "no public controversy" and he felt there has been public controversy. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- member Brandes, that Resolution No. 82-441, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City~s guidelines and that a negative declara- tion is appropriate for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval for an 88 multi-family unit complex on an approximately 4.7 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Amador Court, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Butler NOES: Councilmember Wood ABSENT: None After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 82-442, denying the application of Harris Realty and Mildred Vallarino for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval for an 88 multi-family unit complex on an approximately 4.7 acre site lo- cated on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Amador Court, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, and Wood NOES: Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Butler ABSENT: None Appeal of Richard Hempy of a decision of the Planning Commission denying his applica- tion for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval for a four lot resi- dential subdivision of approximately 4.35 acres of land located on the west side of Foothill .Road~aadjacent on the south to 5050 Foothill Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Low Density Residential District Consider adoption of Negative Declaration Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on this item and continued to the meeting of Novembers23, 1982, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers, at the request of Gil Barbee, representing the applicant, by letter dated November 4, 1982. Application of Devcon Construction Inc., for development plan approval for four light industrial/office buildings totalling 54,111 sq. ft., and related facilities on a 3.7 acre site located on the northeast side of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company railroad tracks between Mohr Avenue and Trenery Drive. The current zoning on the pro- perty is I-P (Industrial Park) District with rezoning of the property in process to the PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Industrial Park Consider adoption of Negative Declaration Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 82:448) dated November 1, 1982, regarding this matter. 6. 11/9/82