CCMIN102582 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Dave Poole, 4117 Hazelhurst Court, stated he lives just across the street from the area being reviewed but had not been notified of any meeting regarding this issue. He stated he has concerns about traffic on Mohr Avenue as there are already many problems on this street. He stated he did not feel it is fair to add traffic to this street to profit developers. Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, 4102 Fairlands Drive, representing Mr. Robert Molinaro, stated that Mr. Molinaro is opposed to Trenery Drive being made a through street and would like to have the opportunity to review any street plans before a decision is made. Mr. John Montgomery stated he supports the presentation made by Mr. Weimken; and that he does not favor changing the general plan, is opposed to any additional annexation and development, and is opposed to the extension of Trenery Drive to Santa Rita Road. He stated he supports the proposed Kamp development and street patterns. Mr. Jim Fezarri, 3710 Trenery Drive, stated he is opposed to Trenery Drive being opened up to access from Santa Rita Road. He stated the area should remain low density and that he could support the proposed Wagerman development if density is keptlow and the homes are done in good taste. Mr. Fezarri stated he is opposed to the suggestion of a locked gate at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac on Trenery Drive, stating he felt that emergency vehicles would get through faster going other routes. Councilmember Brandes asked if residents in the area would consider main- taining a private road. Mr. Fezarri advised they maintain the road now. Mr. Jim Foley, 4125 Hazelhurst Court, stated his residence is across the street from the proposed future development. He stated there is car-racing on Mohr Avenue now and he is concerned about what will happen to Mohr if additional development goes in. He requested that a traffic study be made on this street. Mr. John Corley, Trenery Drive, stated that Mohr Avenue has always been a race- way. He stated he concurred with the staff report and would rely on Council, Plan- ning Commission and staff to work out what they felt was in the best interest of the City for further development and street circulation in this area. He stated he is concerned about fire protection to this area. He concluded by stating he supports the Wagerman PUD low density development and felt that most of the heritage trees could be preserved. Mr. Weimken urged Council to look at the overall general effect when considering development and street patterns in the Mohr/Martin area. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Butler asked for comments by Council and Planning Commission. Councilmember Mercer stated he favors making Trenery Drive a cul-de-sac and slightly altering the proposed street through the Thorpe property to tie in closer to the four long lots adjacent to this property. He stated he felt Council should establish ground rules for further development of this area but allow any developer to design the development in a unique manner, for Council approval. Councilmember Mohr stated she felt that further alternatives regarding Trenery Drive should be reviewed. Councilmember Brandes stated his prime concern in this area is the possibility of it being developed in a "chopped-up" effect. He stated this is a very unique area and should be developed in a creative style and with unique street patterns. He added he felt the traffic circulation problems can be resolved. 3. 10/25/82