CCMIN092882 - Laserfiche WebLink

183 The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Mayor Butler, that Ordi- nance No. 1051, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of the City of Pleasanton to amend Article 8, and re- lated portions of Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasan- ton to further define regulations related to outdoor sales, allowing outdoor sales three times a year, be adopted. Council discussion ensued regarding the number of times that outdoor sales should be allowed. Councilmembers Mercer and Wood felt it should be more than three times a year. Councilmember Mohr stated she felt the number of times allowed for sales should be left open. After discussion, Councilmember Brandes withdrew his motion, and Mayor Butler withdrew his second. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that Ordinance No. 1051, to be read by title only and waiv- ing further reading thereof, approving the application of the City of Pleasanton to amend Article 8, and related portions of Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton to further define regulations related to outdoor sales, and to allow outdoor sales four times a year, be re-introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Report from the Industrial General Plan Review Steering Committee Mr. John Innes, Chairman of the Steering Committee, presented the report of this Committee, outlining assignment of responsibilities for the Industrial General Plan Review Committee. Mr. Innes stated that with regard to the proposed paid consultant it was the feeling of the committee that this person should be responsible to the City Manager with indirect reporting to the Steering Committee. He further stated he felt any formal contract should be prepared by the City Manager's office as well as provision of a secretary if necessary for the consultant. He requested the City Manager to bring a specific report regarding this matter for review by Council and the Steering Committee. Mr. Innes reviewed the specific land use problem areas and stated that no specific action is recommended on these areas at this time. Mr. Innes reviewed the organizational chart and flow proposed for the General Plan Re- view to follow. He stated the Steering Committee felt it is the prerogative of the City Council to determine who will appoint citizens to the General Plan Review Com- mittee. He stated the Steering Committee felt the five subcommittees should be chaired by persons that have served on the Steering Committee, in order to maintain continuity and order. Mr. Innes reviewed the timetable proposed by the Steering Com- mittee, stating that if the assignments and appointments are made immediately the study can be completed within one year. Mr. Innes reviewed the inventory of indus- trial zoned land which has been divided into two categories: (1) lands to be in- cluded in land use designations; and (2) lands to be excluded from land use designa- tion. Mr. Innes concluded by requesting Council to accept the scope of work as pre- sented by the Steering Committee and to issue a call to the community for citizens wishing to serve on the General Plan Review Committee study. 4. 9/28/82