CCMIN072782 - Laserfiche WebLink

179 The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Brandes After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that the police facility financing program would include only the cost of construction of the building, and that the communication equipment would be paid for from existing funds. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Brandes SPECIAL REPORTS There were no Special Reports presented at this meeting. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS There were no reports of Boards and Commissions presented at this meeting. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Report on Request for Annexation; 3683 Vineyard Avenue (north side of Vineyard Avenue west ~f Linden Way) Will and Gladyp Heinrich (Contd. from'7-13-82) Mr. Warnick advised this item had been continued from the meeting of July 13, 1982, so that all residents in the Remen tract could be notified and have input regarding this matter. He stated he had received a letter from Mr. Brewer, pro- perty owner of the third property west of Mr. Heinrich, indicating he supports the Heinrich annexation and would probably like to annex his property to the City at some time in the future. Mr. Walker presented a letter from Mr. William Hirst, attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Heinrich, requesting continuance of this item due to his absence from this meeting because of vacation, unless annexation proceedings are initiated by Council on this property. Mr. Chuck Muth, 3644 Vine Street, expressed opposition to annexation of this property. He stated the reason the property would like to be annexed is for further development of the parcel. He stated that further development in this area would adversely impact the lifestyle of the residents in the Remen tract. He added that item 12b on the agenda states that annexation is not cost effective to the City. Councilmember Mohr asked if Vineyard Avenue improvements could be made the responsibility of the property owners. Mr. Warnick advised that it would be much easier to form an assessment district of property that is within the City limits. Mrs. Karen Durham, 3568 Vine Street, stated she had spoken with most of the residents of the Remen tract and the majority were opposed to this annexation. She stated they were concerned about the preservation of the basic rural qualities of the area. She stated that if the proposed project were multiple stores it would be stressful for surrounding neighbors. Mrs. Durham stated that the high density residential units already on Vineyard Avenue are creating a negative traffic impact and increased crime. She added that if annexation of this property is initiated, she felt that any further development of the property should not be allowed. It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, to initiate annexation proceedings on the 0.8 acre parcel on the north side of Vine- 5. 7/27/82