CCMIN102583 - Laserfiche WebLink

The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Report o~ S~rplus School Property Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 83:479) dated October 20, 1983, regarding this matter. Councilmember Brandes stated that with the large residential growth in the Del Prado area he felt additional park area should be considered at this location, if it is determined that a school will not be required. He asked if Council could keep the same zoning as it is now. Mr. Harris advised it is up to the City to determine what the general plan and zoning will be for that property. Councilmember Mercer stated he questions the City purchasing more property for parks. He added that he felt there is more need for additional park area in the Del Prado area than in the Mission Park area because of the increased number of residents in De! Prado. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Council- member Mercer, that Resolution No. 83-481, directing staff to notify the Murray School District that the City has no interest in purchasing the Stoneson School site and to notify the Pleasanton Joint School District that the City would like to enter dis- cussions for the purchase or trade of all or a portion of the Mission Park School site, and that such notification would not obligate the City in any way, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None Reeuest for Exemption from Growth Management Program for Valley Plaza Villages II Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 83:474) dated October 19, 1983, regarding this matter. Mr. Duncan Matteson, representing Valley Plaza Villages, stated that negotiations are still pending relative to the easement right-of-way. He stated he concurs with the staff report with the exception of the element of two-thirds designation of low income units to be two bedroom units; adding that the Federal Government generally requires equality between the one and the two bedroom units. He requested Council to change the two-thirds designation of two bedroom units to one-half. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Mayor Butler, that Resolution No. 83-482, approving the low income housing exemption for Valley Plaza Villages II, to be implemented through an agreement between the City and the developer incorporating the following four elements: 1. Fifteen (15) year rent limitation of 32 designated units (although flexibility should be allowed over time to allow shifting in such designation). 2. One-half (16) of the designated low income units should be two bedroom units, and one-half should be one bedroom units. 3. Rent adjustments may be allowed annually based upon HUD income guidelines. 4. The developer and his successors shall be responsible for yearly status 10. 10/25/83