Laserfiche WebLink
319 <br /> <br /> vehicular access to the Valley Plaza project. He stated that purchase of the Patel <br /> property for vehicular access to the project will add to the cost of the housing, <br /> which is set forth as-affordable housing. Mr. Hirst advised that Mr. Patel is not <br /> against the project or affordable housing, but as a businessman he feels he will be <br /> deprived of full use of his property if part of it is used as a vehicular access to <br /> the Valley Plaza project and accordingly he will resist acquisition of the property. <br /> <br /> Mr. K. D. Patel, owner of the E1 Rancho Motel, stated this matter has caused <br /> grave concern to himself and his family. He stated he is not ready to sell any of <br /> his property and there would be many disadvantages in doing so. He begged Council <br /> for their sympathy and mercy on his behalf relative to this matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Matteson stated the widening involved with the vehicular access is only 28 <br /> feet, which should still allow Mr. Patel ample room for any expansion to his busi- <br /> ness that he has in mind. He stated that the access road should enhance Mr. Patel's <br /> business. He advised that any access on Tanager Court is not feasible and would be <br /> a mistake to consider. Mr. Matteson suggested that three appraisers be consulted; <br /> one employed by Valley Plaza Associates, one hired by E1 Rancho Motel, and one by <br /> mutual consent, to review the economic feasibility of the access road for the E1 <br /> Rancho Motel, in order to satisfy the concerns of Mr. Patel. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- <br /> member Brandes, that Resolution No. 83-220, approving the agreement between the City <br /> and Valley Plaza Associates II, giving the developer approximately one year to ac- <br /> quire ownership of the project site and request the City to initiate a Resolution of <br /> Necessity, and authorizing the appropriate city officials to execute the agreement, <br /> be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: Councilmember Wood <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> COMMUNICATIONS <br /> There were no Communications presented at this meeting. <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR <br /> Mr. Walker presented the City Council Calendar for the information of the <br /> Council. Council scheduled June 6, 1983, 7:30 P.M., Pleasanton Council Chambers, as <br /> the date and place the review the 1983-84 Budget and Three-Year Capital Improvement <br /> Program. <br /> <br /> EXECUTIVE SESSION <br /> Mayor Butler recessed the meeting at 1:15 A.M., to an Executive Session to <br /> discuss pending litigation. <br /> <br /> Mayor Butler reconvened the meeting at 2:10 A.M. <br /> <br /> ADJOURNMENT <br /> There being no further business at 2:15 A.M., it was moved by Councilmember Wood, <br /> and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that the meeting be adjourned to meet again in <br /> Regular S~ssion on June 14, 1983, at 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />ES R. WALKER, CITY CLERK 21o 5/24/83 <br /> <br /> <br />