My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051083
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
CCMIN051083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:52:19 AM
Creation date
11/9/1999 11:56:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative <br /> declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Desmond Worth, retired Telephone Company employee and resident of Pleasanton <br /> Meadows for nine years, reviewed the composition of the neighborhood, stating that <br /> there are already approximately 679 multi-family, high-density units in the area now <br /> and he is opposed to the addition of 126 more units. He stated that the Hacienda Busi- <br /> ness Park and development of the Mohr/Martin area will increase traffic on Santa Rita <br /> Road which could adversely affect the Pleasanton Meadows area. He concluded by stat- <br /> ing that the proposed project will add too much high density in a small area and he is <br /> against it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ed Roquette, President of the Pleasanton Meadow Homeowners Association and <br />Cabana Club, stated that the developer had contacted the Board of Directors of the <br />Association as well as the residents on Weymouth Court, but that the majority of the <br />people living in Pleasanton Meadows have not been contacted by the developer relative <br />to the proposed project. He stated that a petition is being circulated by the "grass <br />roots" people at this time relative to their concern about high density of the pro- <br />posed development. He stated that Planning Commission had reversed their original <br />decision regarding density on the project; citing Minutes of the meetings of March 9th <br />and April 27th. Mr. Roquette advised that it is the general feeling of the residents <br />of Pleasanton Meadows that they are not opposed to apartments at this location but the <br />density is too high on the proposed project, and stated that 21.7 units to the acre <br />would be acceptable to this group. He stated that recent discussions with the developer <br />were at an impasse relative to the number of units for the project. <br /> <br /> Councilmembers discussed the history of this particular piece of property, re- <br />viewing the various zoning changes and proposed development plans. Councilmember <br />Brandes requested that the present application not be continued any longer than two <br />weeks. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fred Houston, 4460 Sandalwood Drive, Pleasanton, representing the developer, <br />stated that the developer had met with the leadership of Pleasanton Meadows and asked <br />them how they wanted the property developed. He stated the developer has attempted <br />to meet the concerns of the residents. He advised the developer could be ready for <br />the public hearing on this matter in two weeks. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer stated he had concerns about density, the intersection be- <br />tween the fire house and the entrance behind the Exxon Station, and the wall. He <br />requested the item be continued thirty days to allow ample time for all affected <br />residents in the area to review the plan and make comments to the developer regarding <br />their concerns. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated he is opposed to the project because he feels it is <br />too dense; that he had voted against it previously and would do so again. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated she felt two weeks continuance is not enough time to <br />allow the Pleasanton Meadows residents to obtain the information they need and to <br />hold meetings. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Wood stated he had concerns about traffic and density. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, to con- <br />tinue the public hearing open for two weeks to the meeting of May 24, 1983, 8:00 P.M., <br />in the Pleasanton Council Chambers, the application of Meadow Plaza Associates for PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development) zoning and development plan approval for a 126 unit multi- <br />family residential complex on an approximately six acre site located east of the Exxon <br />Station at the southeast corner of West Las Positas Boulevard and Santa Rita Road, and <br /> <br /> 4. 5/10/83 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.