CCMIN011183 - Laserfiche WebLink

441 Councilmember Mohr stated she had followed the directions of the City Attorney who advised Council to vote in good conscious and in the best interest of the entire City, and that her vote would not change. It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Mayor Butler, that Ordi- nance No. 1056 approving the Quail Creek project on Vineyard Avenue, be repealed. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmember Mercer and Mayor Butler NOES: Councilmembers Brandes and Mohr ABSENT: Councilmember Wood The motion failed because of the tie vote. Set Election Date Mayor Butler stated it is now in order to establish the election date regarding this matter. Mr. Thomas O'Donnell stated it is his opinion that this matter is not referend- able; that any matters that were considered referendable have come and gone. Mr. O'Donnell withdrew his remark that the citizens had made threats against the City Council. He concluded by reiterating that this is a good project and will provide housing for those people who want to live in Pleasanton. Mr. Steve Weschler requested to be advised of the costs of this election as soon as that figure has been determined. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- member Brandes, that Ordinance No. 1067, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, ordering an election to be held on April 19, 1983, to submit Ordi- nance No. 1056 (Quail Creek Project) to the voters of the City of Pleasanton, with direct arguments for and against Ordinance No. 1056 to be submitted to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m., February 9, 1983, and rebuttal arguments submitted to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m., February 23, 1983, be introduced and adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Wood MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Alternate Propqsa.1..fol .H~l_verson-Juhl property, 8.8 acre site north side of Valley Avenue west of Valley PlaZa ShoRping Center (Contd. from 9-28-82~ 10-12-82~ and 12-13-92) Mr. Duncan Matteson, representing Mrs. Halverson and Dr. Juhl, thanked Council for the continuance of this item to allow time to negotiate development of the pro- perty with the owners of the land as well as adjacent landowners and surrounding neighbors. He requested Council to send this matter back to the Planning Commission to allow them to present a PUD development plan for the entire 8.8 acre parcel of property owned by Mrs. Halverson and Dr. Juhl. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- member Mohr, that the matter of the Halverson-Juhl property, 8.8 acre site north side of Valley Avenue west of Valley Plaza Shopping Center, be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration of zoning and a PUD development plan. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Wood 5. 1/11/83