CCMIN091184 - Laserfiche WebLink

of the master plan, without a railroad project nearby. He presented a petition, signed by 248 residents, which read as follows: "We the undersigned petition the Pleasanton City Council to adopt the General Plan proposal of the city staff and approved by the Planning Commission which includes a senior housing project, senior center and intermediate care facility. We heartedly endorse this planning concept for a senior support center for our city". Mr. Herlihy asked for a shows of hands in the audience from those in favor of this project. Approximately 80 people supported the project. Mr. Bob Reid, 4525 Mirador Drive, commended staff on the master planning of this property. He urged Council to support the concept of developing the major portion of this area in housing for senior citizens, with related facilities associated thereto. There was no further public testimony from the audience. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Council- member Mohr, that Resolution No. 84-463, approving the master plan for the city owned 37 acre parcel of land on Sunol Boulevard including the senior citizen housing pro- ject with maximum density use consistent with the proposed use and Pleasanton's character; and initiating a general plan amendment changing the land use designation on the remainder of the property to High Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Public and Institutional, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Mercer commended Mr. Herlihy for his efforts relative to this senior citizen project. He advised the audience that Mr. Herlihy had been instrumental in obtaining the land for the Pleasanton Sports Parks and that he has contributed many hours for the betterment of the City of Pleasanton. Council expressed interest in the excursion railroad llne south of the City, and advised the Pacific Locomotive Association that further consideration of this matter is possible. PUBLIC HEARINGS Appeal of a decision of the Plannin~ Commission approvin~ conditional use permit to allow the establishment and operation of a subdivision sales office and model home complex in three residential units located at the southeast corner of Spr.~n~dale Avenue and Stonedale Drive. The property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development)- High Densi!y Residential District '('Contd. Open from 8-14-84) Mayor Mercer stated this item was continued from the meeting of August 14, 1984. He declared the continued public hearing open. Mr. Mike Perkins, 5371 Brookside Court, the appellant, stated he had agreed to the continuance of this item from the meeting of August 14, 1984, because of the pend- ing partial settlement between the homeowners and Stoneson Development Company for repair of roofs and siding of damaged residences. He stated that the partial settle- ment was apparently signed this date~ and that nothing has been done relative to re- pair of the roofs and siding. He added that what is being proposed for settlement is not sufficient, there is a great deal more to be done. Mr. Perkins stated that with regard to the model home complex, there are a number of reasons this should not be allowed: not enough parking; the street is extremely congested at that corner; he 5. 9/11/84