CCMIN082884 - Laserfiche WebLink

191 MaFor Mercer declared the public heaping open on the application and the nega- tive declaration. Mr. Dana Owyoung, 255 Ygnacio Valley Road, Walnut Creek, representing Jerry Loving -- Architects, stated the project meets the requirements of City codes and he feels the project design is attractive and appropriate for the site. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. Mayor Mercer stated he had asked to have this matter appealed because of his con- cern relative to density. He advised that he has carefully reviewed the proposed plans for this project and is satisfied that it is appropriate and meets City requirements. He expressed appreciation to Messrs. Joy and Loving for reviewing the plans with him, and apologized for any delay he may have caused. T~ It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that ~!~ Resolution No. 84-441, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental C~ study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as ~[ outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with the application of Patrick Joy and Jerry Loving for design review approval for a fourteen unit residential condominium complex on an approximately .5 acre site located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Peters Avenue and Rose Avenue, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ' ABSENT: Councilmembers Brandes and Butler It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 84-442, denying the appeal by the City Council of a decision of the Design Review Board, and approving Z-84-185, the application of Patrick Joy and Jerry Loving for design review approval for a fourteen unit residential condominium complex on an approximately .5 acre site located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Peters Avenue and Rose Avenue, subject to the following conditions: (1) that the development be substantially as shown on the site plan, elevations, landscape plan, floor plans, and grading plan, Exhibit A, on file with the Planning Department; (2) that all fences facing Peters Avenue and Rose Avenue shall be tex- tured stucco matching the stucco proposed for the main buildings on the site; (3) that the fence around the patio for unit 11 shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height; (4) that the columns supporting the carports shall be wooden beams or shall be veneered with wood; (5) that the railings surrounding the decks facing Peters Avenue shall be wood lattice or shall appear to be wood lattice; (6) that the two screening fences be- tween the parking area and Rose Avenue shall be a maximum of 30 inches in height; (7) that the sidewalk on Rose Avenue be constructed at property line unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer; (8) that the electroller on Peters Avenue be relocated by the developer if required by the City Engineer; and (9) that this project shall be subject to all Standard Conditions of Development, made part of this case by reference~ except conditions 21, 25, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 46, 49 and 50, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmembers Brandes and Butler 5. 8/28/84