My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN062684
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
CCMIN062684
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:50:09 AM
Creation date
11/9/1999 11:27:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Warnick advised that Grade Way Construction made a mistake in their bid <br />form and had requested their bid be withdrawn, which was approved by Council at <br />their meeting of June 12, 1984. Mr. Warnick stated the figures presented in his <br />report to Council this date are accurate and he recommended award of the contract <br />for this project to O. C. Jones & Sons. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tom Skelly, representing O. C. Jones, stated their bid is legal and proper <br />and he felt the contract should be award to them as the low bidder. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rod Gustafson, representing O. C. Jones, stated they have looked at all <br />bids and that O. C. Jones is the lower bid. <br /> <br /> Mr. Chris Clark, representing DeLeuw Cather and Company, design engineers for <br />the Pleasanton grade consolidation project, stated they prepared the bid list, that <br />it was a complicated job, but that it was not unusual to have this many bid items <br />on a proposal. He stated that all bidders have the same amount of time to prepare <br />their final bid. He advised that the total variation of bids was 5%, indicating the <br />bidders understood the project they were bidding on. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- <br />member Brandes, that Resolution No. 84-331, denying the protest of Redgwick Construc- <br />tion Company, and awarding contract for the construction of railroad grade separation <br />with Western Pacific Railroad Company at Pleasanton-Sunol Road (south of Verona Road), <br />Bernal Avenue and Del Valle Parkway, Project No. 84-7, to O. C. Jones and Sons, and <br />authorizing execution of the contract by the appropriate city officials, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Wood <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Request for Annexation, 5470 Foothill Road (Dr. Joel) <br /> Mr. Warnick presented his report (SR 84:336) dated June 26, 1984, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, di- <br />recting staff to prepare a formal resolution requesting the annexation and an appli- <br />caticn to LAFC0 for the 59 acres easterly of Foothill Road owned by Dr. M. Joel[ <br />notifying the adjacent property owners of the time when this resolution will be con- <br />sidered; and requiring the applicant for this annexation to have an acceptable legal <br />description and map of the proposed annexation (meeting LAFCO standards) prepared by <br />a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor, and that the applicant be required to pay <br />the LAFCO and State processing fees. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Initiation of General Plan Amendments for Industrial General Plan Review Committee's <br />Recommendations for 13 Land Use Designations and Industrial/Commercial/Office Floor <br />Area Ratios <br /> Mr. Harris presented his reports (SR 84:356 and SR 84:357) regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- <br />member Mohr, initiating General Plan amendments for the 13 land use designations and <br />circulation element changes listed in Staff Reports 84:356 and 84:357, and FAR re- <br />commendations proposed by the Industrial General Plan Review Committee; directing <br />staff to evaluate the CommitteeTs recommendations as part of the General Plan update <br />scheduled for Fiscal Year 1984-85; and agreeing to consider the Committee~s land use <br /> <br /> 13. 6/26/84 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.