CCMIN052284 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commission and staff. He advised that Planning Commission recommended removal of the palm tree on the property but staff has recommended saving the tree if at all possible. Mr. Amaral stated the tree looks like an 80t telephone pole and he would like to remove it and replace it with a better tree at a better location. He urged approval of his application. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that Resolution No. 84-253, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with the application of Lee Amaral for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-zoning and development plan approval for an eight unit multi-family residential project on an approximately 0.28 acre site at 404 St. Mary Street, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordi- nance No. 1144, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of Lee Amaral for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-zoning and development plan approval for an eight unit multi-family residential project on an approximately 0.28 acre site at 404 St. Mary Street (southwest corner of St. Mary Street and Peters Avenue), subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2469 (allowing removal of the palm tree), be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Application of Ashwill Hawkins and Partners, Inc., for design approval of four office/ industrial buildings totalling approximately 36,900 sq. ft.., and related facilities on an approximately 2.4 acre site at 2174 and 2183 Rheem Drive. Zoning for the property ~s PUD ~Pi~ned Unit Development)-Industrial District Consider Adoption of Negative Decla~ation After discussion, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing on this item open, and continued to the meeting of June 12, 1984, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers, because the applicant was not present to answer questions from Council. He instructed staff to notify the applicant to have a representative present at that meeting to answer questions from the Council. ~pplication of Ashwill Hawkins and Partners, Inc.~ for design review approval of an ~pprox.imately 13,800 s~. ft. Building and related facilities on an approximately 0.86 acre site at 2158 Rheem Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Develop- ment)-industrial District Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration After discussion, Mayor Mercer declared this item open and continued to the meeting of June 12, 1984, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers, because the applicant was not present to answer questions from the Council. 10. 5/22/84