Laserfiche WebLink
403 <br />Development)-zoning and development plan approval for a 40 unit residential development <br />project on approximately 4.7 acres at 3780 Vineyard Avenue, subject to all conditions <br />contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2435, except deleting condition number <br />12 which prohibits any construction on the site until construction has begun on the <br />improvements necessary to connect Bernal Avenue with Valley Avenue, be introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Application of Val West~ Inc., for PUD (Planned Unit Development )-development plan <br />a~proval of a 200 unit residential development project on app~oxima~el[ 35 acres <br />located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. Zoning for the <br />[roperty is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />(Contd. Open from 2-27-84) <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:163) dated March 19, 1984, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the continued public hearing open on the application and <br />the mitigated negative declaration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mike Valley, representing Val West, reviewed the background of this property, <br />and advised that he had taken over this parcel last year and has begun plans for a <br />200 unit project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ralph Martin, project architect, reviewed the design elements of the project <br />stating it is a single-family detached residential project, low profile, 1-2 story <br />units-angular relationship, varying series garage doors, angular streets, and 935-2173 <br />sq. ft. units conducive to couples, small families, retirees, and senior citizens. He <br />stated it is a fine project, and he asked that it be approved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Valley addressed the park and recreation considerations, stating he had met <br />with the Park and Recreation Commission regarding the proposed park at the front of <br />the project, and they felt this should be a private park maintained by the developer. <br />He stated that Planning Commission had recommended 1/3 of the park dedication fees be <br />given as credit to the development. Mr. Valley stated they have met the proper open <br />space element and that the park would be maintained by the people of the project, Mr. <br />Valley reviewed the traffic studies for Vineyard Avenue, stating t.h~t part of the pro- <br />blem seems to be at the intersection of the First Street and Vineyard Avenue signaliza- <br />tion. He advised he had hired a traffic engineer to do some research relating to this <br />traffic problem to find out how it could be mitigated. Mr. Valley stated he would pay <br />for improvements necessary to mitigate traffic problems at the intersection of First <br />Street and Vineyard Avenue; that he would phase his project over four years, with con- <br />struction startin~ in 1985 and a completion date of 1990; and that he would contribute <br />the $!10,000 park dedication fee credit to a benefit district fund toward design and <br />engineering plans for the Valley Avenue-Stanley Boulevard improvements. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jeff Damon, Traffic Engineer for Barton Aschmann, stated he had reviewed the <br />signalization at First Street/Vineyard Avenue intersection and felt that improvements <br />could be made to change the phasing that would improve traffic flow, and that these <br />improvements would cost between $5,000-$50,000. Mr. Warnick stated he would look at <br />Mr. Damon's plans for these improvements, but that all studies thusfar have indicated <br />that the signalization at this intersection is as it should be relative to phasing. <br /> <br /> 7. 4/24/84 <br /> <br /> <br />