CCMIN042484 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mrs. Irene Bennington, 4957 Mohr, stated she is opposed to any access into th ~ quiet residential neighborhood. She advised that Council will find they guaranteed there would be no access onto Sutter Gate as shown in the Minutes of Tapes of meetings held in 1979 relative to this matter. She stated she is concerned that any access could bring all traffic from the park through this neighborhood, which has been approxi- mated at 3700 cars per day. She stated the Arroyo Mocho is an attractive nuisance and she requested Council to investigate this problem. Mr. Larry Bartelson, MacKay & Somps, representing Crocker Homes, the developer, displayed a map showing the latest plan which is virtually the same one that was acted upon in 1979, showing an emergency access on Sutter Gate. He stated this is the map that the Citizens Committee agreed to go along with. He advised there would be no through traffic at this access; only emergency equipment and a pedestrian walkway. He stated that Crocker Homes feels the emergency access is important to the City of Pleasanton, and that the original map was approved with the pedestrian access way. He added that this map is the one to be considered for approval by City staff next week as the preliminary tentative map. After considerable discussion, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing continued open on this item to the meeting of May 8, 1984, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers; instructed staff to prepare a report on several alternatives for emergency access as well as supplying background information regarding previous action taken on this issue; and directing that another meeting be scheduled with the Citizens Committee from this area, City staff, the developer, and Prudential, in an attempt to resolve the concerns of the residents; and advising staff to proceed with the preliminary tentative map consideration. Application of Frank Auf der Maur for PUD (Planned Unit Deve!opment)-development plan a_jDproval of an approximateAy 38 acre commercial business park consisting of 32 com- mercial lots ran~ing in size ~om 0.5 to over 1.0 acre in size and related facilities to be located at the eastern terminus of the Del Valle Parkway - southeast of the intersection of Washington Street and Stanlgy Boulevard. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Commercial District Consider. Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration [C%ntd. Open from 2-27-84) Mayor Mercer declared this public hearing continued open to the meeting of May 8, 1984, 8:00 P.M., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers, at the request of the applicant. A~.plication of Amador Associates for PUD (Planned Unit Development)yzoning and develop- ment Dlan approval for a 40 unit residential development p~oject o~ appro.xima!ely 4.7 acres at 3780 Vineyard Avenue. Zoning for the property is R.-1-6500 (Single-family Residential) District Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration (Contd. Open from 2-27L84) Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 84:158) dated March 19, 1984, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the continued public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Lou Baldacci, representing Amador Associates, displayed project plans and re- viewed various changes made relative to reduction of density, increase in parking ratio, increased setback from surrounding residential area on Mavis Street, and im- proved landscaping. He addressed the fencing construction, stating he planned to install a precast concrete wall. He discussed the drainage problem on Vineyard Avenue and stated improvements to his project should alleviate this matter. Mr. Baldacci 5. 4/24/84