CCMIN042484 - Laserfiche WebLink

standard requirements as well as specifically requiring the following: (1) the exten- sion of utility systems necessary to serve the DeGarmo property shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and all costs and fees shall be paid by the DeGarmo's; (2) the existing septic tank and seepage pits shall be filled to the satis- faction of the City Engineer; and (3) the existing well shall be disconnected from the house water lines and used for irrigation and swimming pool filling only, and the new City water connection shall be in full compliance with City requirements for backflow prevention, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Approval of Pleasanton/Dublin Transit Study Mr. Walker presented the report of the Assistant to the City Manager (SR 84:217) dated April 18, 1984, regarding this matter. Councilmember Mohr advised that the Cities of Dublin and Livermore had approved the study at their Council meetings held last night. It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that Resolution No. 84-207, approving in principle the Pleasanton/Dublin Transit Study; directing the City Councilis representative on the Transit Study's Policy Committee and the appropriate City staff to work with the representatives of the other partici- pating jurisdictions to put the joint powers agreement and bylaws in final form and prepare an implementation plan and schedule; and directing the staff to submit the joint powers agreement, the bylaws and the implementation plan to the City Council for approval on or about July 1, 1984, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Discussion of Proposed Transportation Systems Management Ordinance Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 84:224) dated April 19, 1984, regarding this matter. Mr. Jack Hovingh, 4250 Muirwood Drive, stated the TSM ordinance is a good stab at solving problems. He suggested the following changes: (1) under No. 1 Section C- Findings, that the comment "exceeding the City noise ordinance or State or Federal air standards", be added after in-parenthesis LOS E; (2) item 3G i~ definition - that peak hours of 7:30 a.m.-8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m., should be less specific on hours; (3) under item 4-C-2B - any reasonable combination of TSM measure including but not limited to transit related programs ride sharing other than vehicle commute modes, should be change to other than non-vehicle commute modes; and that over time should be changed to over a period of time; and (4) add a Section 12 - in the event that 45% re- duction of peak traffic does not achieve the minimum standards of traffic level service or causes a noise level that exceed City standards or air standards set or exceed State or Federal standards the City reserves the right to require a greater reduction in peak traffic than 45% to achieve these minimum standards. Mr. Jack Swanson, representing Prudential Insurance Company and Ca!lahan Pentz stated that overall he felt the TSM ordinance is an excellent ordinance but that after a start up period of two years on a voluntary basis then the ordinance should be put on a mandatory basis. After discussion, Mayor Mercer directed staff to prepare a draft Transportation Systems Management ordinance to be considered in approximately six weeks. 11. 4/24/84