|
After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council-
<br />member Brandes, that Resolution No. 84-150, approving the appeal of Lesher Communica-
<br />tions, Inc., of a decision of the Design Review Board relating to Condition No. 1 of
<br />their approval, and approving a 10,000 sq. ft. office building and related facilities
<br />on an approximately .5 acre site located at 139 Spring Street, subject to the following
<br />conditions: (1) that the developer dedicate to the City for street right-of-way purposes,
<br />a five foot wide parcel along the Spring Street frontage and that new curb, gutter and
<br />sidewalk be installed in this area; (2) that the developer grant to the City a five foot
<br />wide public service easement parallel with and contiguous to the five foot wide dedi-
<br />cation; (3) that any gates installed in the driveway areas shall be set back away from
<br />the back of the sidewalk or operate in such a manner that vehicle turning movements will
<br />not be restricted and cause the travelled way in Spring Street to be obstructed; (4)
<br />that the design of the wrought iron fence and gates shall be submitted to the Planning
<br />Division for approval prior to issuance of a building permit; and (S) that approval of
<br />this case is subject to all Standard Conditions of Development, made a part of this case
<br />by reference, except conditions numbers 12, 19, 29, 46 and 50, be adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Butler
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr
<br />
<br />MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION
<br />~option of Ordinance No. 1125, approving the application of vorelco of california, Inc.,
<br />and Integrated Storage Corporation for PUD (Planned Unit Development) development .pla~
<br />approval for an approximately 70,000 s~. ft. mini storage facility on an approximat.e!y
<br />2.5 acre site located at the southeast corner of Stoneridge Drive and 1-680
<br />(Intro. 2-14-84, 3-Ayes, 2-Noes; Re-Intro. 2-28-84, 5-A.~e'~)
<br /> Mayor Butler declared this item continued to the meeting of April 10, 1984, at the
<br />request of the applicant.
<br />
<br />Adpption of Ordinance No. 1129, amending. Title V, Chapter 5, Article 1~ of the Ordinance
<br />
<br /> Mayor Butler stated that Ordinance No. 1129 was introduced on February 28, 1984, by
<br />a vote of S-Ayes, was re-introduced on March 13, 1984, by a vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent,
<br />for language change, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance.
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that
<br />Ordinance No. 1129, amending Title V, Chapter 5, Article 1, of the Ordinance Code of
<br />the City of Pleasanton to require trucks to use designated haul routes, be adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Butler
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr
<br />
<br />Adoption of Ordinance No. 1130, approving the application of the City of Pleasanton to
<br />prezone approximately two acres in two parcels at and adjacent to 500 Happy Valley Road
<br />to the PUD (Planned Unit Deve!opment)-Low Density Residential District
<br />~Intro. 3-13-84, 4-Ayes, 1-Absent)
<br /> Mayor Butler stated that Ordinance No. 1130 was introduced on March 13, 1984, by a
<br />vote of 4-Ayes, 1-Absent, and that it was now in order to adopt the ordinance.
<br />
<br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that
<br />Ordinance No. 1130, approving the application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone
<br />approximately two acres in two parcels at and adjacent to 500 Happy Valley Road to the
<br />PUD (Planned Unit Deve!opment)-Low Density Residential District, be adopted.
<br />The roll call vote was as follows:
<br />A'~: Cou'ncilmem~ers Brandes, Mercer, Wood, and Mayor Butler
<br />NOES: None
<br />ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr
<br /> 7. 3/27/84
<br />
<br />
<br />
|