CCMIN021484 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUBLIC HEARINGS Application of Vorelco of California~ Inc., and Integrated Storage Corporation for PUD (Planned Unit Development) development plan approval for an approximately 70~000 s~. ft. mini storage facility on an approximately 2.5 acre site located at the southeast corner of Stoneridge Drive and 1-680. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) General and Limited Industrial District Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration Mr. Glenn presented the report of the Director of Planning and Community Development (SR 84:72) dated February 6, 1984, regarding this matter. Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Leland W. Topham, President of Integrated Storage Corporation, Burlingame, pre- sented displays showing the design of the building and the landscaping layout. He stated he concurs with the staff report. No one'in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Butler declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. Councilmember Mohr expressed concern regarding the landscaping plan. She stated she would prefer trees that will mature to a height that will exceed the height of the build- ings. Mr. Topham stated he had been guided by staff as to the type of trees, and is agreeable to plant whatever size and type tree that Council directs. Councilmember Mohr asked about the landscaping plans for the rear of the building adjacent to the sewer pond. Mr. Topham stated that he could not visualize anyone seeing the back side of the building but he was willing to do whatever Council desires. Mr. Andy Mack, representing Bissell and Karn, reviewed the easement and off-ramp landscaping. Councilmember Brandes expressed concern regarding the type of roofing to be used, stating he would prefer tile. Mr. Topham stated that tile roofing costs are prohibitive. He stated that the metal roofing would be pre-cast and will be a weathered copper color. Councilmember Brandes also expressed concern regarding the density of the project, stat- ing that he feels it is much too high. Mr. Topham stated that the type of facility being proposed will not generate any significant adverse impacts such as traffic. He added that the footprint coverage is 42%. It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that Resolution No. 84-69, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with the application of Vorelco of California, Inc., and Integrated Storage Corporation for PUD (Planned Unit Development) development plan approval for an approxi- mately 70,000 sq. ft. mini s~orage facility on an approximately 2.5 acre site located at the southeast corner of Stoneridge Drive and 1-680, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler NOES: None ABSENT: None After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Council- member Mercer, that Ordinance No. 1125, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the application of Vorelco of California, Inc., and Inte- grated Storage Corporation for PUD (Planned Unit Development) development plan approval for an approximately 70,000 sq. ft. mini storage facility on an approximately 2.5 acre 7. 2/14/84