CCMIN010785 - Laserfiche WebLink

a previous meeting that he had no intention of developing his property when it is annexed to the City, but it has now come to Mr. Muth's attention that development plans are being considered by Mr. tteinrich at this time. Mr. Muth requested Council to continue this item until completion of the Vintage Hills/Vineyard Avenue study, which is expected to be considered by Council on February 26, 1985. He reiterated his concern regarding traffic in the surrounding area and feels that further develop- ment will create additional problems. Mr. Ben Tarver, 1144 Arak Court, stated it is his understanding that there is a plan on the drawing board for the subject property, and asked if the zoning is con- sistent with the surrounding area for zoning. Mr. Harris advised that no plans have been submitted but he had received a call this date regarding development plans for the Heinrich property. Mr. Harris stated that zoning is consistent with surrounding property. Mr. Tarvet stated that the majority of Vintage Hills residents prefer only single-family residential development; and are opposed to any further multi-family development. Mr. Tarver stated he concurs with the previous speaker, and requests that this item be continued until after review of the Vintage Hills/Vineyard Avenue study. Mrs. Karen Duran, 3568 Vine Street, stated it is the wishes and desires of the Remen tract residents that dwellings in this area remain consistent with those already existing in the Remen tract, and she saw no reason for rezoning. She stated it is inappropriate to consider rezoning at this time because of the study in progress. She also felt this matter should be considered bv the Residential General Plan Review Com- mittee. Mr. T. Dillard, 452 Linden Way, stated he is opposed to any prezoning of medium type zoning of this area. He likes the rural lifestyle and would prefer to keep the environment as it is now. Ms. Sharrel! Maller, 415 Linden Way, stated this area is single-family homes now. She asked that Councilskeep low density zoning in the Remen tract area, and to wait until after review of the study to make any decision on this matter. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by'Council- member Brandes, to reopen the public hearing on RZ-84-18, application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone the five parcels totalling approximately 1.9+ acres located at 3655, 3683, and 3731 Vineyard Avenue to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Medium Densit~ Resident~_al District or any other zoning district in conformance with the General Plan, and consideration of adoption of Negative Declaration, and continue this item to the City Council meeting following consideration of the Vintage Hills/ Vineyard Avenue study. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, ~ood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None PUD-84-7, Application of John and Joan Caroline for development'plan approval for a 19 unit detached single-family residential project proposed for the approximately 2.0 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Mavis Drive. This site is currently being orezoned PUD (F!anned Unit Development)-Medium Density Resi- ~entia! Distric't Consider Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration Mr. Harris presented a letter from Mr. Caroline, requesting that this item be continued to the meeting of February 12, 1985. 5. 1/7/85