CCMIN010785 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. George Garibaldi, 3240 Vervais Avenue, stated he has been at this location since 1949. In 1967 he applied for a permit to build a swimming pool but was turned down because he was told the Det Va!le Parkway would be going through his property. Nothing has been done to date, traffic on his street is unbearable because of busi- nesses in the area, and he is ready to move. He feels the Del Valle Parkway should be constructed as scon as possible to alleviate traffic problems. Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, 62 W. Neal Street, Chairman of the Downtown Committee, stated that one of the issues this committee intends to continue to study is the extension of the Del Valle Parkway. He stated there is going to be increased traffic problems. He stated it is time a decision is made, and he encouraged that considera- tion be made regardin~ a commitment for the extension, how wide the street will be, and to put it in the fiscal budget to be done in the near future. Mr. George Spi!iotopoulos, 830 Main Street, stated he agrees with and supports staff recommendations. He stated he has no preference between the 66 ft. right-of- way or the 84 ft. right-of-way, as long as the center line stays the same. He stated he would like to preserve the heritage of the residential section. He advised he has agreed to the dedication of a 66 ft. or an 84 ft. right-of-way, and would urge Council to deal with this expansion through a study. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that the staff be directed to immediately commence a study of the pro- posed Det Va!le Parkway between Main Street and Bernal Avenue to include the follow- ing: (!) traffic studies to determine the need for the proposed road and the effects on other roadways if it is not constructed; (2) alternative alignments with compara- tive data on costs, relocation effects, and other impacts; (3) recommendations as to any needed changes in the adopted plan-line and/or General Plan Circulation Element; (4) recommend construction schedule with phasing program if needed; and (5) an environ- mental assessment of the project with an Environmental Impact Report, if required. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mer~er NOES: None ABSENT: None REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Update of City o~ Pleasanton Sewerage Code Mrs. Wagner presented her report (SR 85:0?) dated January?, 1985, regarding this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1175, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, amending Chapters 8 ~sewage) and 9 (water) of Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton, updating the City of Pleasanton sewerage code, be introduced. Tt~e roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Consideration of Council Commensation Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 85:17) dated December 27, 1984, regarding~ this matter. Councilmember Wood suggested this be placed on the next ballot 'for a Vote of the people on ~his issue. After discussion, it was moved'by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Butler, ttiat Ordinance No. 1176, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, setting Citv Councilmembers salaries at $400.00 per month, tobecOme effective following the 1986 election, be introduced. 12. 1/7/85