CCMIN121785 - Laserfiche WebLink

Council concurred. Mayor Brandes instructed staff to prepare the appropriate letters. Councilmember Wood stated that he requested information regarding addi- tional health programs in October and had not received an answer to date. Mr. Walker advised that he has met with various health foundations and would have a report prepared for the next meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Mayor Brandes stated that the Library Committee is moving rapidly along with plans and will have information to present to Council at the next meeting. MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC Mr. Ronald Whitman, 205-F Main Street, representing Hivest, Inc., request- ed that Ordinance No. 1232, approving PUD-80-15-2D, application of Hivest, Inc., for Planned Unit Development Plan approval to construct a two building retail commercial complex on an approximately 2.0 acre site located on the south side of Pimlico Drive, be considered for adoption at the January 7, 1986 Council meeting. Councilmember Mercer stated that he had concerns regarding color, landscaping, soundwalls, etc. Mr. Whitman advised he would have this information available at the next meeting. Mayor Brandes instructed staff to place this item on the January 7th agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Reconsideration of PUD-85-2-2D, Application of the Val Strough Company for development plan approval for four auto dealership buildings on a 5.8 acre site located on Rosewood Drive south of 1-580 and northwest of Santa Rita Road. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Developmentt-Central Com- mercial District Mayor Brandes stated this item was considered by Council at their meeting of December 3, 1985, and was denied without prejudice because of various concePns. Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 85:605) dated December 17, 1985, regarding this matter. Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing open on this item. Mr. James Heddy, representing the applicant, addressed concerns of the Council. He stated that the landscaping along the front has been determined and approved by Caltrans. He stated he would not object to placing more land- scaping onto the islands within the property. With regard to the signs, he stated that three of the four signs are nice and keyed to each other; one sign is not attractive and could be lowered, placed on a single pole and made more tasteful. Mr. Peter Schnugg, representing Trammel Crow Company, stated he is in favor of the development. He stated that with regard to an assessment dis- trict, he has an agreement with BMW and Val Strough to pay off their portion of the assessment district. He felt that if a mutual benefit district is es- tablished that all properties should be considered equally at the time the district is formed. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. - 4 - 12-17-85