CCMIN080685 - Laserfiche WebLink

Richard Guasco for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Commercial Service zoning to allow auto wrecking facilities as a conditional use on an approximately 1.4 acre site located at 3862 and 3876 Old Santa Rita Road, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Vice Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Butler and Mayor Mercer It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1212, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-85-14., application of Richard Guasco for PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Commercial Service zoning and development plan to allow auto wrecking facilities as a conditional use on an approximately 1.4 acre site located at 3862 and 3876 Old Santa Rita Road, subject to all conditions con- tained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2683, and that the subject site be rezoned to the PUD (C-S) District with all allowed and conditionally al- lowed uses within the PUD to be those of the C-S District with the addition of auto wrecking as a conditionally allowed use, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Wood, and Vice Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Butler and Mayor Mercer PUD-85-12, Application of Sacramento Developers, Inc., for PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning and development plan approval for a 56 unit townhouse com- plex on an approximately 9.3 acre site bounded by Stoneridge Drive to the north, Highway 1-680 to the east and Stonedale Drive to the west. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-High Density Residential District Consider Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 85:373) dated August 6, 1985, regarding this matter. Vice Mayor Brandes declared the public hearing open on the application and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mr. Gregory Mix, Architect, 205-B Main Street, representing the applicant, presented design plans and reviewed the proposed project. He stated it has been suggested that there may be some problems with the cedar shakes for fenc- ing and he would like to come back with an elevation plan to be reviewed by staff for proposed wooden fences in that area. He advised there has been no opposition from neighbors. He stated he generally agrees with the conditions, with the exception oF Condition No. 9 regarding sidewalks, which Mr. Glenn will address. Mr. Richard Glenn, Planning Consultant, 205-B Main Street~ stated that staff feels the five foot wide sidewalk should be increased to eight feet. He opposed this change because the additional sidewalk would add an approximately $22,000.00 cost to the developer; it would diminish the very pleasing land- scape design; he questioned the concept that pedestrian traffic should be mixed with bike traffic on a sidewalk, stating that the existing right-of-way is safe for both vehicle and bike traffic; and that state traffic safety guidelines discourage bicycle and pedestrian traffic on the same sidewalk. Mr. Glenn stated he feels the requirement of a eight foot wide sidewalk is an overkill. 11 8-6-85