CCMIN061786 - Laserfiche WebLink

389 landscaping, parking, furniture, etc. He stated that to provide an appropri- ate building in Pleasanton and the next 10-15 years and provide the necessary services would require a budget of $6 million. Mr. Richard Sampson, consultant, explained the cost structure and time schedule for the proposed project. He advised that design of the library should be completed in 1986; bidding, selection/award, NTP, building shell, and interier construction should be completed in 1987; and that the library should be completed in the spring of 1988. He presented a budget of $6 mil- lion; which would provide contingency, site lighting, landscaping, paving, -- A&CM fees, building structure, and furnishings. He stated that most of the money would be disbursed in the Spring 1987 to the Spring 1988. Ms. Ginnie Cooper, Alameda County Librarian, reviewed the staffing and book needs to provide adequate service for the new library. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that Resolution No. 86-280, accepting the proposal for a 30,000 sq~ ft. library building and a budget of $6 million; and authorizing further design work, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: (y) AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, and Mayor Brandes NOES: Councilmembers Mohr and Wood (33 ABSENT: None Li=] Mayor Brandes recessed the meeting at 9:45 p.m. ~ Mayor Brandes reconvened the meeting at 9:55 p.m. Approval of Long Term Agreements with Lin, DeVor, Johnson, and Lund/Castlewood "' Councilmember Butler presented the report of the Subcommittee dated June 11, 1986. He stated that in his view the long term agreements are completely consistent with the direction Council gave the Subcommittee recently. He ad- vised the key points are (1) because of the demand for long term agreement and the expected short fall of growth management program element to accommodate the requested units, it is important to deal only with projects that meet the requirements of the ordinance; (2) the starting point for working this out for those projects eligible was a uniform allocation of 50 units per year per project; and (3) uniform public needs fees. Councilmember Mercer stated that in the past the Long Term Subcommittee presented a complete package of long term agreements for Council consider- ation; he stated this is the 4th City Council meeting that this matter has been considered. He stated he is concerned about the 12 unit exemption for small projects being too high; he felt the small project set aside is more appropriate. Mayor Brandes stated he is concerned about whether or not Council should be dealing with long term agreement before adoption of the revised general plan. He asked if there was any reason that the long term agreements should be approved at this time. Councilmember Butler advised that at the time the long term agreements were taken into consideration it was expected that the revised general plan would be adopted in June. Mr. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer, representing three of the four appli- cants for long term agreements, stated it is important to move ahead with the - 6 - 6-17-86