CCMIN030387 - Laserfiche WebLink

445 It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that Ordinance No. 1301, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-82-16-2M, application of HSC Development for a major modificatioh to an approved development plan for a 39-unit single-family residential project to allow for an increase to a 48 unit project, to be located on an approximately 42 acre site located generally on the north side of Crellin Road opposite the intersection of Rhine Way and Crellin Road, as conditioned by the Planning Commission, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None AP-87-1~ Appeal of a decision of the Design Review Board approving a modified application of C. J. Hinkston for design review approval to construct an automobile rental/sales site located at the southeast corner of Rosewood Drive and Old Santa Rita Road. Zoning for the property is C-S (Service Commercial) District Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration (Contd. Open from 2-17-87) Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 87:88} dated March 3, 1987, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Mr. Mike Cooper, Civil Engineer, representing the appellant and Avis Auto Rental, stated the two conditions of approval that are of concern relate to the reimbursement to CPS for street improvements along Old Santa Rita Road, and requiring a freestanding monument sign of approximately seven feet in height in lieu of the requested 20 foot high pylon type sign. Mr. Cooper stated that at the time Old Santa Rita Road was improved he was working for the consulting firm of Bissell & Karn; CPS assured all property owners at the time of the street improvements they would not be required to pay any of the expenses. Mr. Cooper stated he felt it is unfair for Mr. Hinkston to be required to pay this reimbursement fee of $8,508.00 to CPS when other property owners did not have to do so. He stated that with regard to the freestanding sign, Avis feels they need the freeway exposure to.make their business known and would request that the twenty foot high pylon sign be allowed. He stated they are willing to remove the sign after three years and replace it with the seven foot monument sign. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Resolution No. 87-93, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for the project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with AP-87-1, appeal of a decision of the Design Review Board approving a modified application of C. J. Hinkston for design review approval to construct an automobile rental/sales facility on an approximately 0.8 acre site located at the southeast corner of 6 - 3-3-87