CCMIN021787 - Laserfiche WebLink

431 AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Option Agreement for Purchase of School District Office and Main Street Right- of-Way Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 87:72) dated February 17, 1987, regarding this matter. Mr. Bob Lovell, 5376 Mallard, and City employee, stated that City em- ployees working conditions are terrible. He stated he is very proud of what employees have accomplished for the City, and he felt that to promote further good working habits and morale that the purchase of the school district office should be accomplished as soon as possible. Council discussion ensued regarding how soon a move could be accomplished. Mr. Walker advised that the earliest time would be June or August depending on when school district administration offices at the Pleasanton School are completed. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 87-77, approving the Purchase Contract and Option Agree- ment allowing the City to purchase the approximately .472 acre parcel for the Main Street realignment and the approximately 1.53 acre site and district of- fice building; and authorizing execution of the contract and agreement by the appropriate city officials, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Council instructed staff to make the move effective to the school district offices as soon as possible. Council also emphasized that this is a short- term solution to the overcrowding problem for City employees; consideration will continue relative to new City Hall. Request to Delete 20 Acre Parcel from Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 87:75) dated February 17, 1987, regard- ing this matter. Mr. Lou Baldacci, representing Far West Associates, Ltd., stated they property owners representatives, Castle Construction, would like to proceed with their development plan as soon as possible and to do so would require their parcel to be deleted from the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan, the parcel must be redesignated to Medium and High Density Residential, and the proposed PUD would have to be reviewed by staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. He asked if Council has reviewed the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan. They advised they had just received the report this evening and therefore had not read it. Mr. Baldacci requested this item be continued to allow Council suf- ficient time to study the report. He concluded by stating he did not feel that the deletion of his 20 acre parcel from the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan would have significant impact on the plan. Mr. Harvey Levine, 4637 Chabot Drive, representing the Chu property, stated he was not aware this matter was going to be discussed and asked that no action be taken until each property owner could comment on the issue. 8 - 2-17-87