Laserfiche WebLink
' 369 <br />be determined exactly what was done and what was left out. It seems out of <br />fairness that the people on'the bottom of the hill were not told fairly every- <br />thing that they needed to be told. The City's position in this is that they <br />have the information if the buy comes in and asks for it, but the City does <br />not know who the buyer is so cannot pass on the public information. The prob- <br />lem of whose responsibility that it, is another question. The situation needs <br />to be solved quickly before other people sustain considerable damage to their <br />property. He felt Option 2 is the best solution, and it allows people to work <br />together to try and work it out. It will allow them to form a homeowners as- <br />sociation, and would also allow anyone to sue if they want to. This option <br />gives everyone an alternative. He felt that the people who bought the bottom <br />lots weren't given all the information they should have had, and that is not <br />fair. He did not know that the upper people should have to pay for that, but <br />he felt the person who should have told them had 2/11 of upper Twelve Oaks; <br />maybe the other 9/11 could go after him. Mayor Mercer stated that in fairness <br />the bottom people should not be held accountable for the additional $5,000.00 <br />worth of work. He supported Alternative No. 2. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated he agreed with Mayor Mercer but will still <br />vote against Alternative 2 because he is concerned that Council is not set- <br />tling the long term issue. He is in favor of getting the work done as soon as <br />possible but he is more concerned about the long term issue and feels this <br />isn't the right way to solve it. He asked if it would be in Public Works <br />responsibility to outline some recommended on-toing maintenance requirements <br />for the works that are in Twelve Oaks now, not future works. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wil- <br />son, that Resolution No. 87-13, approving Alternative 2 of Staff Report 87:21 <br />directing City staff to undertake the maintenance work associated with Twelve <br />Oaks and bill the Upper Twelve Oaks Homeowners Association for the cost; au- <br />thorizing the emergency work to be undertaken on the basis of quotes rather <br />than formal bids in accordance with Public Contracts Code Section 20168; and <br />stating that the City involvement is based upon the emergency circumstance and <br />is not intended to set a precedent, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Butler <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott advisd that work on these improvements could begin <br /> immediately. <br /> <br />Reappointment of John Vizzolini to Alameda County Mosquito Abatement Board <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that the term of John Vizzolini as Pleasanton's rep- <br /> resentative on the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District expired January <br /> 2, 1987, and it is his recommendation that he be reappointed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember But- <br /> ler, that Resolution No. 87-14, reappointing John P. Vizzolini to represent <br /> the City of Plesanton on the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Board <br /> for a term of two years effective January 2, 1987, be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 17 - 1-6-87 <br /> <br /> <br />