CCMIN110387 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Peter Schutz, 533 Peters Avenue, Architect, stated he felt the trellis would become lost and would not enchance the design of the project. He added that all freeway frontage has minimal visibility. No one in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember But- ler, that Resolution No. 87-489, determining on the basis of a review of ini- tial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environ- mental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-87-24, application of Brookside Development Company for Planned Unit Development rezoning and development plan approval for an approximately 5,650 sq. ft. automobile wash- ing facility and related improvements to be located on an approximately 0.90 acre site located on the north side of Pimlico Drive approximately 800 feet east of the intersection of Santa Rita Road and Pimlico Drive, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember But- ler, to approve PUD-87-24, application of Brookside Development Company for planned unit development rezoning and development plan approval for an auto- mobile washing facility and related improvements to be located on an approxi- mately 0.90 acre site located on the north side of Pimlico Drive, subject to conditions set forth by Planning Commission except deleting Condition No. 12 relative to requiring a trellis, and adding a condition that the facility will be a' full service car wash. Mayor Mercer stated he could support the motion if two more conditions were added: (1) that the signage plan comes back to City Council for approval; and (2) that no alcoholic beverages will be sold on the premises. Councilmember Butler stated he could not support these conditions, and withdrew his second. The motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wil- son, that Ordinance No. 1345, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, and finding that the rezoning and development plan are con- sistent with the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD ordinance; approve PUD-87-24, application of Brookside Development Company for Planned Unit Development rezoning and development plan approval for an approximately 5,650 sq. ft. automobile washing facility and related improvements to be located on an approximately 0.90 acre site located on the north side of Pimlico Drive approximately 800 feet east of the intersection of Santa Rita Road and Pimlico Drive, subject to conditions listed in Attachment A of Staff Report 87:488 but deleting Condition No. 12 relating to requiring a trellis along the north building elevation, and adding the following conditions: (1) that the facility will be a full service car wash; (2) that the signage plan will come back to the City Council for approval; and (3) that no alcoholic beverages will be 7 - 11-3-87