CCMIN091587 - Laserfiche WebLink

357 Improvement District; that property before it was sold for residential pur- poses had fees associated with it. He stated he argued previously that Tram- mell Crow and the NorLhern Group properties should not go through the Growth Management Program but should be exempted. He would prefer to see the fees charged. He stated he has not heard any arguments as to why the Northern Group project should be spread out for three years. He would like to see that project succeed and if it is critical he did not see the reason to add the third year for this developer. Councilmember Mohr stated she did not see any reason for the three year period for the Northern Group. She felt that asking the Northern Group and Trammell Crow to pay the $750.00 per unit is asking them to pay double. She stated that lower income units are being required in these developments. She stated she is willing to support some modification of fees. Mayor Mercer asked how Council intends to pay for Capital Improvement projects that are based on the development fees. Councilmember Butler stated that in every budget in every year Council adjusts priorities to fit the needs and funds of that year; he felt it inap- propriate to say the capital improvement budget depends on these fees. Mr. Walker stated there seems to be a finite number of units in the new general plan; he stated that looking at these fees has to be taken into ac- count when designating capital improvement projects. Councilmember Brandes stated he is still concerned about how the City is going to provide services for the people who will purchase these units. He stated he is not against the projects but is concerned about how the City is going to be able to take care of them. He does not have the information on that. Mayor Mercer stated the object is to provide a logical level of growth; he felt that 405 units in 1988, 394 units in 1989, and 84 units in 1990 is rea- sonable. He added there will always be a backlog. Councilmember Brandes stated that Council has put a limit of 1,000 units per year to a total of 62,000 population; he suggested a gradual approach in order to be able to provide services. He asked if Council can take action without addressing the issue of maintaining appropriate levels of service. Mr. MacDonald advised that the draft resolution and staff reports relating to the recently adopted growth management ordinance include enough information to make a decision regarding this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Wilson, and seconded by Councilmember But- ler, that Resolution No. 87-423, approval of growth management allocations as follows: 1988 1989 Northern Group 140 214 + $750.00 per unit Ferreri/Matteson 100 164 + $750.00 per unit Trammell Crow 112 100 + $750.00 per unit Diamond Properties 25 + $750.00 per unit B-W Construction Co. 28 + $750.00 per unit TOTALS 405 478 - 9 9-15-87