Laserfiche WebLink
105 <br /> <br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> There were no reports of Boards and Commissions presented at this meeting. <br /> <br /> REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />Consideration of Extending Application Deadline for 1989 Growth Management <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 88:90) dated March 1, 1988, regarding <br /> this matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michael P. Durkee, Attorney representing TMI, requested an extension <br />of the Growth Management deadline from April 1, 1988 to September 1, 1988. He <br />stated that TMI's Stoneridge Meadow project has been in the pipeline since <br />1986 but unfortunately has undergone certain delays during the Specific Plan <br />process. He stated that fairness dictates that the deadline should be extend- <br />ed, extending the deadline will not allow more growth, and extension will <br />still allow competitive review of projects. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated that Council has not made any decision on the <br />TMI project; and that he felt no one should be entitled to special privileges <br />- they should have had their plans processed earlier. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harvey Levine, 7020 Koll Center Parkway, speaking on behalf of the <br />Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan, stated he has been working diligently with the <br />City for about twenty months. He asked that the deadline be delayed until <br />September 1, 1988, so that Council can look at this project along with others. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lou Baldacci, Far West Associates, representing the Molinaro property, <br />requested that the deadline be extended to September 1, 1988. From his per- <br />spective moving the Growth Management back to September 1 would give Council <br />discretionary action and allow him more time to process his plans. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated he strongly concurs with staff recommenda- <br />tions. He felt there is not enough information at this time regarding in- <br />frastructure or how the maximum of 178 units will be allocated. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Wilson felt that Council should separate the four projects <br />currently restricted from applying for growth management due to conditions of <br />approval based on the Vineyard Avenue moratorium. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated these projects are not ready to build but are <br />asking to apply for Growth Management; he felt it is appropriate to have them <br />in the pipeline and they do not detract from the issue of the moratorium. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmembe Wilson, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, <br />that staff bring back a major modification to the two Gooch projects (Heritage <br />Gardens I and Heritage Gardens II) that are already in process, and to process <br />a minor modification for the Church of Jesus Christ project and for Foxbrough <br />Estates - Crellin Road, to permit these projects to apply for Growth Manage- <br />ment in advance of the lifting of the Vineyard Avenue moratorium. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Brandes <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Council discussion ensued regarding allocation of the 178 units that are <br />remaining, appropriate years to allocate Growth Management, long term agree- <br />ments, and provision of infrastructure information. <br /> <br /> 6 - 3-1-88 <br /> <br /> <br />