Laserfiche WebLink
The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, and Mohr <br />NOES: Councilmember Wilson and Mayor Mercer <br /> <br /> Mayor Marcar instructed staff to bring hack the Downtown Revitalization <br />District Ordinance for review and evaluation. Mr. Swift advised Planning <br />C~,mdssion will be reviewing this matter in September along with the Downtown <br />Association and Chamber of C~m~erce; the ordinance should be hack to Council <br />for consideration in October. <br /> <br />item 9f <br />PUD-88-5, Application of Spieker Partners for Planned Unit Development <br />rezoninq and development plan approval 'to construct an approximately 65,348 <br />sq. ft. ~ial/service oam~ercial cc~lex to be located on an <br />approximately 8.4 acre site located on the west side of Rosewood Drive, <br />approximately 600 feet north of the intersection of Santa Rita Road and <br />Rosewood Drive. Zoninq for the property is CC {Cen~ Cux~u~erc~a!) District <br /> <br />Consider AdoUtion of Neqative Declaration <br /> (Contd. Open fl~D~f, 6-21-88 and 7-5-88) <br /> Mayor Mercer declared this item withdrawn fr~-~ the agenda at the request <br />of the application, who anticipates being able to resubmit revised plans later <br />this year. <br /> <br />PUD-83-12-5M, Application of bas Homes for a ma~or modification to an <br />approved development plan for an existinq residential pro~ect to allow 6 foot <br />fences to be constructed within 7 feet of the property line on the street side <br />of corner located on Lots 7, 11, 14, 15, and 19 of Tract 5445 on Martin Avenue <br /> Zoninq for the property is PUD {Planned Unit Develop~ent)-IEw Density <br /> Residential District <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 88:347) dated July 19, 1988, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Metper declared the public hearing open on the item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Steve Stern, representing bas Hc~es, stated originally the <br />application was for 10 foot setbacks, then changed to 25 foot setbacks; now <br />they are requesting the 10 foot setback be reest~_blished. He presented <br />renderings showing the houses set at an angle on the lots. He stated t_hat <br />keeping the 25 foot setback creates a hardship on the homeowner as it takes <br />away fx-c~, his inside yard. <br /> <br /> Mr. Scott Green, 2020 Martin Avenue, stated when he bought his home he <br />was not aware of this setback; Mr. Stern is representing the hc~eowners who <br />want the 10 foot setback. <br /> <br /> Mr. Howard Pack, 1992 Martin Avenue, stated that the extra 15 feet inside <br />their yards will allow the hc~eowners to have a garden or swimming pool. He <br />feels the setback should be 10 feet. He said he is unhappy about not being <br />notified about this matter in the first place. <br /> - 13 - <br /> <br /> 7-19-88 <br /> <br /> <br />