Laserfiche WebLink
349 <br /> <br />are under construction and some which are not. Now the City is looking at <br />1989, 802 units have been approved for that year and Council is now talking <br />about whether to make additional allocations. In past years the builders have <br />been a little bit slower than the City approvals and staff analysis of indi- <br />vidual projects indicates that does not seem to be the case anymore. Almost <br />all projects that have received City pproval are well under way, if not just <br />barely under construct. Some are very close to being completed. Next year <br />the number of units in backlog will be greatly diminished. The only projects <br />that probably won't be completed this year are those that had 1988 approval, <br />there the development process seems to take a little longer than usual for <br />most projects. Staff does not anticipate those will be built. There are only <br />two large projects that are really in arrears Kottinger Ranch project and <br />Walter Johnson project, which have had multi-year approvals for several years <br />and have not yet begun. Both of those projects expect to be under construction <br />this summer, and they will catch up very quickly on their multi-year <br />approvals. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Wilson stated that everyone is aware of the problems in <br />Pleasanton - traffic, classrooms, underpasses, on and off ramps, etc., and <br />Council is doing their best to solve these issues. No Councilmember is going <br />to approve wholesale growth management. When these problems are solved then <br />Council will be able to approve some projects. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated in trying to resolve the School District problem <br />of allocating growth management units for the proposed trade of land, can this <br />be handled as an exception or will there have to be an amendment to the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br /> Mr. MacDonald stated it would have to be an amendment to the ordinance. <br /> <br /> Council discussion ensued regarding the trade of land with the School Dis- <br />trict. Mr. MacDonald advised this could not be discussed at this time because <br />it is not an item on the agenda. Mayor Mercer instructed staff to place the <br />matter on the next agenda. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that <br />Resolution No. 88-238, determining that 162 units of growth management are <br />eligible for allocation, and recommending that a fair share will be allocated <br />to the School District with the possible trade of land, and that the remaining <br />will be applied to small projects as recommended by the Growth Management Com- <br />mittee and approved by City Council, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Brandes <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />item 12c <br />Approval of Ownership and Finance Documents for Senior Citizen Housinq Project <br /> Mr. Walker presented the report of the Assistant City Manager (SR 88:228) <br />dated May 17, 1988, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated the rents seemed very low, and asked if this <br />included meals. <br /> <br /> 13 - 5-17-88 <br /> <br /> <br />