CCMIN101888 - Laserfiche WebLink

263 No one in the audience spoke in favor of or in opposition to the item. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Resolution No. 88-501, determining on the basis of a review of initial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with RZ-88-8, application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone an approximately 27 acre site to the "P" (Public and Institutional) District located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Bernal Avenue and Case Avenue, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr It was moved by Councilmember Wilson, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Ordinance No. 1388, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving RZ-88-8, application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone an approximately 27 acre site to the "P" (Public and Institutional) District located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Bernal Avenue and Case Avenue, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Mohr item 9c AP-88-21, Appeal of a decision of the Board of Adjustment denying Case V-88-19, the application of Raymond Bohn for a variance from the Municipal Code to allow retention of an accessory structure that encroaches into the required sideyard setback of the property located at 6824 Corte de Flores. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density Residential District Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 88:497) dated October 18, 1988, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. Mr. Raymond Bohn, appellant, stated that in 1985 he built a swimming pool in his small back yard, which left him only ten feet on one side and three feet on the other side. He needed a utility shed to keep his tools. He advised that he kept his neighbors informed about the structure and no one was opposed to it. He stated he is asking for a variance because that is the only location in his yard he can place the shed; it is six feet to his neighbor and there are no windows on either side. He stated the - 11 - 10-18-88