My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN022189
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
CCMIN022189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:41 AM
Creation date
11/3/1999 11:04:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
261 <br /> <br /> Redevelopment Plan, and overrules all written or oral objections <br /> to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Tarver, and Vice Mayor Butler <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAINED:Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Tarver, that Resolution No. 89-85, finding that the <br />use of taxes allocated from the Project for the purpose of <br />improving and increasing the community's supply of low- and <br />moderate-income housing outside the Project Area will be of <br />benefit to the Project, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Tarver, and Vice Mayor Butler <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAINED:Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Tarver, that Resolution No. 89-86, making its <br />findings based upon consideration of the Final Environmental <br />Impact Report for the Downtown Redevelopment Project, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Tarver, and Vice Mayor Butler <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAINED:Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Tarver, that Resolution No. 89-87, defining the <br />Project Plan to be consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan, <br />thus eliminating the Del Valle Parkway (Main to Stanley), the <br />Sunol Boulevard Extension, removal of the Union Pacific/Santa Rita <br />Undercross, and parking structures (but that the parking surfaces <br />remain) from the Plan, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Tarver, and Vice Mayor Butler <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAINED:Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Tarver, that Resolution No. 89-88, that a Special <br />Election for the Redevelopment Plan for Downtown Pleasanton be <br />placed on the next reasonably-timed ballot for vote of the <br />electorate, be adopted. <br /> <br /> Vice Mayor Butler stated he could not support the above <br />motion because it is his feeling that he is elected to make <br />decisions, and he will not pass the buck on this matter; City <br />Council should be able to make this decision. <br /> <br /> - 13 - 2-21-89 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.