Laserfiche WebLink
193 <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian responded that there would be no problem about <br />this since they would be doing it at the Park and Recreation <br />Commission soon. <br /> <br />10. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br />Item 10a <br />Adoption of Ordinance No. 1424, approving PUD-83-9-3M, ADDliCatiOn <br />Of Gatewood Associated for a ma~or modification to an approved <br />development plan for a 200-unit apartment complex to allow for the <br />relocation of a tot lot and three car wash areas, located at 3992 <br />Stoneridqe Drive <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that <br />Ordinance No. 1424 be adopted, approving PUD-83-9-3M, the <br />application of Gatewood Associates for a major modification to an <br />approved development plan for a 200-unit apartment complex to <br />allow for the relocation of a tot lot and three car wash areas, <br />located at 3992 Stoneridge Drive. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />11. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> There were no reports from the Boards and Commissions. <br /> <br />12. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />Item 12a <br />Evaluation of Oak Tree Farm Proposal <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 89:345) regarding the <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jack Smith, lawyer for the Currin Group, owners of Oak <br />Tree Farm, presented the following plan for the project: They <br />would proceed with the County Board of Supervisors for zoning for <br />the entire property, ask them to complete their environmental <br />studies, and set aside any consideration of the package plan for <br />later, should everything else fail. In 1989, they would give the <br />City a tentative map and bring to the County a final map of the <br />nine lots that are east of the road with the understanding that <br />these could not be used unless the City gave them the right to <br />access the Castlewood sewer service. In 1990, they would come <br />with a final map of approximately ten to eleven lots on the south <br />end of the property, none of which were under consideration as <br />having a problem. The City would still decide on the sewer plan <br />of these lots. At the end of that time, they would request the <br />City for annexation of the entire property so they could come <br />under the City's Growth Management Program for 1991. They would <br />then deal with the City on the remaining lots, working on about 12 <br />to 15 lots a year with the City deciding on which lots could and <br />could not be utilized. He explained that this procedure would <br />basically give them some use of the property in 1989 and 1990. <br /> <br /> -17- <br /> 8-1-89 <br /> <br /> <br />