Laserfiche WebLink
192 <br /> <br /> Ms. Marian Britbart, Alameda County Administrator's Office, <br /> stated that the County intends to annex the entire site. She <br /> added that this would only be a matter of timing because there are <br /> so many unknown factors about the development, including funding <br /> and the solution to E1 Charro Road. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that since anything planned for the <br /> property would go through the City of Pleasanton, it would seem <br /> expeditious to get the process of annexation completed to avoid <br /> any delays in what would subsequently be done. <br /> <br /> Ms. Britbart stated that the County intends to negotiate with <br /> the City on a split of property taxes and with other developers <br /> regarding funding the balance of the infrastructure. It will also <br /> seek support from the City of Livemore. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the <br /> public hearing closed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, to <br /> adopt Resolution No. 90-81, approving the application by the City <br /> of Pleasanton requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission <br /> (LAFCO) to take proceedings for the proposed Annexation No. 137 <br /> (Staples Ranch, County of Alameda - 27.5 acres), pursuant to the <br /> Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and <br /> Resolution No. 90-82, agreeing to the exchange of property tax <br /> revenues for Annexation No. 137 (Staples Ranch, County of Alameda <br /> - 27.5 acres). <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> 7. SPECIAL AND INFORMATION REPORTS <br /> Item 7a <br /> Actions Taken by the Zoning Administrator, Design Review Board and <br /> Planninq Commission at Their Meetings of April 10, 1990, <br /> April 11, 1990 and April 12, 1990 <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (IR 90:37) regarding the <br /> matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes inquired if PUD-80-16-5d, PacTel Properties would <br /> automatically come to Council for design review approval, and if <br /> so, when that would be. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that staff is trying to consolidate all <br /> PacTel applications and would probably bring these to Council at <br /> the second meeting in May <br /> <br /> - 6 - <br /> 4-17-90 <br /> <br /> <br />