Laserfiche WebLink
123 <br /> <br />of The Prudential Insurance Company bf America for the site- <br />specific development plan on Lot 24A for 153 townhouse units and <br />associated parking, driveway, and landscape improvements, subject <br />to the recommendations regarding Option 1 of Condition 5h, the <br />modifications relating to Condition 5j as stated above, and the <br />condition that the developers will meet with the School District <br />to mitigate the impacts of the development on schools, prior to <br />the issuance of building permits. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6d <br />PUD-90-O1, Application of Alameda County to Prezone to the PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential District <br />an Approximately 25 Acre Site Located South of 1-580, East of the <br />/wistinq Development Along Ballantyne Drive and Stacey Way, and <br />North of the ~sting Development Along Park Place, and to Approve <br />a Development Plan for the Site Consisting of 126 Single-Family <br />Detached Lots, 26 Paired Single-Family Lots, and a 2.7 Acre Park <br />Addition to Meadows Park <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 90:112) regarding the <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the <br />application. <br /> <br /> Mr. Adolph Martinelli, representing Alameda County, stated <br />that the staff report reflects project changes made in response to <br />the DRB and Planning Commission considerations and that he concurs <br />with all the recommendations made. He explained that this 156 <br />acre project is the first phase of the Staples Ranch development. <br />He pointed out that the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan (SDSP) <br />which was adopted in October 1989 identified explicit requirements <br />regarding the design of the project as well as substantial off- <br />site improvements. He said that the County has gone beyond the <br />requirements and attempted to have a creative architectural design <br />and site plan with single-story houses at the intersection to give <br />the development a stepping effect. Twenty-six units have been <br />proposed for affordable housing, available to first-time <br />homebuyers that meet the moderate-income requirements. The County <br />is absorbing the land cost of the 2.4 acres where the affordable <br />houses will be built, as well as the street improvement costs, at <br />an additional cost of $24,000 per unit. He added that the program <br />could be structured so that it could be directed to Pleasanton <br />residents and City employees, subject to a fall back position that <br />if the market is not broad enough, the units would be sold beyond <br />that market. He stated that it is the County's intent to sell the <br />property to a private builder with these restrictions and then use <br /> <br /> - 15 - <br /> 3-20-90 <br /> <br /> <br />