My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN020690
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
CCMIN020690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:34 AM
Creation date
11/3/1999 10:11:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
68 <br /> <br /> Discussion on the Alameda County Open Space Ordinance <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer indicated that the Alameda County Board of <br /> Supervisors has made a decision to send back the General Plan Open <br /> Space Element to the Planning Commission for public hearing and <br /> comments. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush stated he had this item as a closed session item to <br /> be discussed with the Council. <br /> <br /> Discussion on Foothill Road Street Liqhts <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes stated that he has received phone calls regarding <br /> the street lights on Foothill Road along the Golden Eagle Farms <br /> development. He explained that the lights are placed at very <br /> close intervals, and the residents are concerned about the effect <br /> of those lights on their houses. He asked how this was decided on <br /> and if it could be reviewed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott replied that the placements of street lights was <br /> discussed at the time the design was laid out. It was decided <br /> that the lights would be placed in accordance with the City's <br /> street light spacing standards. He recalled no objections at that <br /> time. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes requested Mr. Elliott to specifically check the <br /> actions taken by the Planning Commission and the Council regarding -- <br /> the matter and to stop further street light installations until <br /> this is settled. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr inquired if there would be street lights for Laguna <br /> Oaks. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that lighting plans along major streets are <br /> not normally discussed as part of a PUD. However, this would <br /> certainly be considered when the final PUD, which is now pending, <br /> comes back. It will also be discussed when the project comes <br /> before the Council. <br /> <br /> 9. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> <br /> There were no City Council Committee reports presented at <br /> this meeting. <br /> <br /> 10. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br /> There were no matters continued for decision presented at <br /> this meeting. <br /> <br /> 11. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br /> There were no reports of the Boards or Commissions presented <br /> at this meeting. <br /> <br /> -22- <br /> 2-6-90 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.