CCMIN080790 - Laserfiche WebLink

403 ~4r. Mercer indicated that the citizens' committee process will ~e the same as all the other citizens' committees that the City has had in the past, with the exception that the recommendations of this committee will go to the vote of the people. It will take effect if the people vote for it; otherwise, the plan would be returned to the citizens' committee for revision. Mr. Roush indicated that Section 5. (F) could indicate that if the voters do not ratify the plan, the process would start anew; in the meantime, the property would remain under "Public Health and Safety." Ms. Mohr recommended that (F) be modified to state that the City Council will prepare a new recommendation in the manner provided by that section, in case the citizens' committee decided to disband after its work is done and the plan is not ratified. This would keep the committee process going without identifying it ~ith a particular group of people. Mr. Roush commented that he purposely indicated "~" rather than "the" Ridgelands Review Committee. He added that the language suggested by Ms. Mohr might have an inference that the plan would not go back to a committee. Mr. Brandes pointed out that the lower case could be used to clarify the committee's designation. Ms. Tarver indicated that he would not support the Initiative because the title is incorrect, the purpose is misstated and misrepresented, and the process is being circumvented in terms of the EIR process and the normal planning process in order to get this Initiative on ballot. Mr. Mercer indicated that he could make the same arguments about the SPRC Initiative. it was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Brandes, that Resolution No. 90-147 be adopted, placing the City Council-sponsored Initiative, as amended, on the November 6, 1990 ballot, as amended. The roll call vote was as follows: ~YES: Councilmembers Brandes, 2.Iohr, and Mayor ~.lercer NOES: Councilmember Tarver ABSENT: Councilmember Butler ABSTAIN: None