CCMIN071090 - Laserfiche WebLink

342 Mr. Mercer stated that only one accident is necessary to have the City sued for inadequate lighting. He expressed concern that if lights are required in front of this project, it should be required for Laguna Oaks as well. Mr. Elliott replied that arrangements could be made to require Laguna Oaks to put in the conduits and allow the spaces necessary for the foundations. Ms. Mohr stated that if the residents do not want the lights at this time, they would not want it at a later time either. She inquired what would determine when the lights should be installed. Mr. Mercer replied that the safety factor may require the City to install the lights at a later time. Mr. Tarver commented that he appreciated what is taking place on Foothill Road but that he did not want the exposure to liability if the lighting is not installed according to the standards recommended by staff. It was moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Mr. Mercer, that no lights be installed on Foothill Road except at intersections, where such lights would be according to proper standards The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmember Brandes, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmembers Butler and Tarver ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 13. REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Roush inquired if Council could hold a special meeting on Monday, July 23rd, to consider the Council-proposed ballot measure and two agreements with Wells Fargo, in view of the fact that there is a time limitation to submit election information to the Registrar of Voters and that the two agreements may not be ready for the July 17th meeting. Mr. Mercer indicated that Council could meet on Monday, July 23rd, at 4:30 p.m. 14. COMMUNICATIONS No communications were presented at this meeting. 7-10-90 - 26 -