CCMIN041691 - Laserfiche WebLink

150 Mr. Gary Schwaegerle, 189 West Angela, commented that since the site is a sensitive piece of property, the number and design of the units should be in harmony with the Victorian-style houses along First Street. Ms. Scribner inquired if the expiration date of the project's Growth Management approval would be affected by the change from apartments to condominiums. Mr. Swift said no. He added that the Growth Management approval for the project would expire on December 31st. Mr. Butler indicated that he had no problem with the transfer since it would have no impact on the Growth Management program. It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Butler, that Resolution No. 91-61 be adopted, approving the request of Messrs. Shahbazian and Ghorbani to transfer a previous Growth Management approval granted in 1989, from ten apartment units to ten condominiums Units, to be located at 4262 First Street, as set forth in the Staff Report. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 12b Proposed Alameda County Proqram for the Abatement of Toxic Lead Contamination in the Environment (SR 91:138) Ms. Mohr agreed with Staff's recommendation that the City of Pleasanton not get involved in this program. She suggested that, in lieu of paying a $10 annual fee for lead abatement, owners of pre-1978 constructed units be required to bring their units up to standard upon resale, as was approved by Council for the installation of spark arrestors and suggested earlier by Mr. Brandes for water conservation. Mr. Mercer stated that Alameda County is asking Pleasanton for $135,000 a year for lead abatement; however, none of the seven cases of lead poisoning in the County in the past ten years were attributable to paint. He inquired if this program was adopted by other cities in the County. Ms. Acosta replied that she was not aware of any other city besides Oakland. - 12 - 4-16-91