CCMIN071691 - Laserfiche WebLink

323 Mr. Mercer pointed out that accepting the Report and forwarding it to the Planning Commission is only one of the alternatives presented by Staff. He indicated that Council could review and analyze the Report but that he would prefer to have the Planning Commission do that and send a report back to Council. Mr. Tarver stated that initially, he did not want to accept the Final Report. He indicated that work still needs to be done and that the Planning Commission would have to do a large part of it. He pointed out that reconvening the Committee would not be a real alternative because of the bad feelings that have evolved among the members. Mr. Butler informed the Council that because of long-standing plans, he would not be able to attend the July 30th and August 6th Council meetings. Mr. Mercer stated that the product is more important than time. He emphasized that Council should make sure that the Planning Commission understands that the product is the most important issue here; more important than getting the report in. Mr. Butler added that feasibility and fiscal aspects of the plan should be studied, among other things. It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that Resolution No. 91-112 be adopted, approving Option 1 under Discussion of the Staff Report: Accept the Ridgelands Committee Report, thank the Committee for its hard work, provide any appropriate comments for Planning Commission review, and forward these to the Planning Commission for its public hearing on July 24th. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Council then discussed the rest of the Agenda items, starting with Item 6c. Item 6c Adoption of the Fiscal Year 1991-92 Operatinq Budqet (SR 91:285) Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application. - 27 - 7-16-91