Laserfiche WebLink
184 <br /> <br /> Mr. George Allbritten, 1152 Hopkins Way in Ventana Hills, a <br /> member of the Ventana Hills Steering Committee, indicated that he <br /> was in favor of project and supported Mr. Strickler's comments. He <br /> stated that cutting a road through the Bonde property would involve <br /> filling a 20-foot swale to construct the road and blasting the <br /> ridge and destroying it. He requested that the open space on the <br /> property be accessible to the public and be managed by the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Barry Hafker, 1021 Rutledge Court in Ventana Hills, stated <br /> that he was opposed to the cancellation of the Williamson Act <br /> Contract. He expressed concern about the maintenance of green <br /> belts, as well as the underground water and poor engineering and <br /> geological set-up under the homes in Ventana Hills. He asked <br /> Mr. Swift what the construction of temporary road during the <br /> development of the Bonde property would involve. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that the temporary road from G Court to Lund <br /> Ranch Road would only be built if a right-of-way can be secured <br /> from the property owner and the adjoining Ventana Hills neighbors <br /> do not object. Otherwise, G Court would be connected on an interim <br /> basis through F Court over to Hopkins Way. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hafker stated that there is a reason for the Williamson <br /> Act Contract and that it should not be canceled. <br /> <br /> Mr. Greg Cordtz, 1045 Rutledge Court in Ventana Hills, stated <br /> that the Ventana Hills Steering Committee did a good job at <br /> arriving at a compromise with Shapell Industries. He indicated <br /> that he was opposed to the temporary road going through G Court to <br /> Lund Ranch Road because it would be a fire hazard and present major <br /> problems to the community. <br /> <br /> Mr. Richard Angel, 512 Neal Street, expressed concerned about <br /> the traffic flow should Mirador Drive be extended. He stated that <br /> the this is an established residential area and extending Mirador <br /> Drive would create rather than solve traffic problems. <br /> <br /> Ms. Kay Leedham, 673 Abbie Street, requested the following if <br /> the project is approved: (1) that Lots 46 through 50 be limited to <br /> one-story units since the houses on Abbie Street are at a lower pad <br /> elevation; (2) that view easements be provided and trees be <br /> planted; (3) that the minimum setback for accessory structures for <br /> Lot 50 be increased from 20 feet to 30 feet; (4) that a certified <br /> arborist, to be appointed by the City, trim the heritage oak trees <br /> on Lot 49C; and (5) that the units be harmonious with the <br /> surrounding traditional wood-sided homes with shake roofs, instead <br /> of the proposed Mediterranean-style homes. <br /> <br /> - 8 - <br /> 5-21-91 <br /> <br /> <br />