Laserfiche WebLink
202 <br /> <br /> Mr. Andy Jorgensen, Recreation Supervisor for the City of <br /> Pleasanton, stated that the Committee would function as a task <br /> force to look in detail at the entire issue of public art before <br /> any selection of art is made or any specific project is developed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver inquired if the Committee would include a Council <br /> representative. <br /> <br /> Ms. Severin replied that the presence of a Councilmember would <br /> be a positive input to the Committee. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner inquired if this would be an ongoing committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jorgensen replied that Phase III of the program deals with <br /> the Committee's recommendation on specific guidelines and <br /> procedures, which would include the terms for the Committee and the <br /> duration of the appointment of its members. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, to <br /> approve the recommended tasks and responsibilities for the Public <br /> Art Committee~ as set forth in the Staff Report. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 8b <br /> Review of Modifications to Alameda County Aqricultural Policies <br /> (IR 91:31) <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver inquired whether or not the County notified the <br /> City and followed CEQA procedures with respect to the adoption of <br /> the revisions to the County's agricultural policies. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta replied that she would look into the matter. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that she could not understand the logic of <br /> the County's position "to allow Planned Development zoning only in <br /> areas which have extensive potential for vineyards or field crops," <br /> which would allow houses only in areas which could be developed <br /> agriculturally. <br /> <br /> - 26 - <br /> 5-21-91 <br /> <br /> <br />